• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[G-dRG version 2005: relevant aspects for dermatology].

作者信息

Hensen Peter, Fürstenberg Torsten, Schiller Meinhard, Luger Thomas A, Rompel Rainer, Roeder Norbert

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Hautkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Münster.

出版信息

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005 Mar;3(3):169-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0378.2005.04097.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1610-0378.2005.04097.x
PMID:16372811
Abstract

One year after the obligatory implementation of a new hospital funding system based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) the third version of a German DRG-system has been published. It differs significantly from the previous version. Modifications in the classification system and the introduction of further procedure-based payments contribute to a better depiction of specialized clinical services. A number of acknowledged problems which caused great discussion in 2004 have been solved, yielding a more appropriate mapping of clinical services. The algorithms of the major diagnostic categories have been modified and complications, comorbidities and/or multiple procedures will be considered more precisely in selecting a group. However, some inconsistencies concerning highly specialized medical procedures and special features of impatient dermatological care remain. Nevertheless, a great improvement over the previous versions is apparent. The crucial aspects of the G-DRG version 2005 and the accompanying rules and regulations of payment are reviewed in detail with special relevance to dermatology.

摘要

相似文献

1
[G-dRG version 2005: relevant aspects for dermatology].
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005 Mar;3(3):169-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0378.2005.04097.x.
2
[G-DRG Version 2004: changes in view of dermatology].
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2004 Jan;2(1):15-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0353.2004.03775.x.
3
Case mix measures and diagnosis-related groups: opportunities and threats for inpatient dermatology.病例组合测量与诊断相关分组:住院皮肤科面临的机遇与挑战
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005 Sep;19(5):582-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2005.01258.x.
4
[G-DRG version 2007: a short overview].[2007版德国诊断相关分组(G-DRG):简要概述]
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007 Sep;5(9):778-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06375.x.
5
[DRGs in dermatology. A critical assessment].[皮肤科的疾病诊断相关分组。批判性评估]
Hautarzt. 2004 Nov;55(11):1032-8. doi: 10.1007/s00105-004-0817-1.
6
[Quality assessment of dermatology in the G-DRG system 2004].[2004年G-DRG系统中皮肤病学的质量评估]
Hautarzt. 2004 Nov;55(11):1039-46. doi: 10.1007/s00105-004-0818-0.
7
[DRGs in dermatology: results of the DRG evaluation project of the German Society of Dermatology (DDG)].
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2004 Jan;2(1):24-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0353.2004.03773.x.
8
DRG benchmarking: analysis of service structures and -differences in dermatology departments.疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)基准分析:皮肤科服务结构及差异分析
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014 Jul;12(7):594-604. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12357. Epub 2014 May 21.
9
Introduction of diagnosis-related groups in Germany: evaluation of impact on in-patient care in a dermatological setting.德国诊断相关分组的引入:对皮肤科住院治疗影响的评估
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Feb;18(1):85-91. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm059. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
10
G-DRG Version 2009: new developments.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009 Apr;7(4):318-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2009.07068.x.