• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[对申请病假和残疾的患者的评估、治疗及咨询:卫生委员会的建议]

[Assessment, treatment and counselling of patients claiming sick leave and disability: recommendation from the Health Council].

作者信息

Knepper S

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Dec 3;149(49):2712-4.

PMID:16375013
Abstract

As requested by the Minister for Social Services and Employment, the Health Council of The Netherlands reviewed existing medical guidelines on the assessment, treatment and counselling of patients claiming sick leave and disability. These guidelines were developed separately by physicians concerned with their own specific fields. The Health Council recommends the development of more encompassing guidelines, based on scientific evidence whenever possible, starting with 10 diagnoses that frequently lead to long-term industrial disability. The assessment of long-term disability is complex and varies for each individual. The contribution of scientific 'evidence' remains modest. It is not possible to predict permanent disability with lists of diseases and corresponding medical prognoses. It may be possible to support the assessment by 'mediprudence', cases of example. The recommendation of the Health Council offers perspective toward qualitatively improved assessment of the effects of diseases on patient functioning.

摘要

应社会服务与就业部长的要求,荷兰卫生委员会审查了关于对申请病假和残疾补助的患者进行评估、治疗及咨询的现有医学指南。这些指南是由各相关特定领域的医生分别制定的。卫生委员会建议制定更具综合性的指南,尽可能以科学证据为基础,先从10种经常导致长期工伤残疾的诊断入手。长期残疾的评估很复杂,因人而异。科学“证据”的作用仍很有限。根据疾病清单和相应的医学预后无法预测永久性残疾。或许可以通过“医疗审慎”(实例)来辅助评估。卫生委员会的建议为定性改善对疾病对患者功能影响的评估提供了方向。

相似文献

1
[Assessment, treatment and counselling of patients claiming sick leave and disability: recommendation from the Health Council].[对申请病假和残疾的患者的评估、治疗及咨询:卫生委员会的建议]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Dec 3;149(49):2712-4.
2
[Mediprudence based on previous cases of occupational disability].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Oct 20;151(42):2305-7.
3
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 9. Consequences of being on sick leave.瑞典医疗保健技术评估委员会(SBU)。第9章。病假的后果。
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:207-15. doi: 10.1080/14034950410021899.
4
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 11. Physicians' sick-listing practices.瑞典医疗保健技术评估委员会(SBU)。第11章。医生的病假证明开具做法。
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:222-55. doi: 10.1080/14034950410021916.
5
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 12. Future need for research.瑞典医疗保健技术评估委员会(SBU)。第12章。未来的研究需求。
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:256-8. doi: 10.1080/14034950410021925.
6
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 7. Sickness absence and psychiatric disorders.瑞典医疗保健技术评估委员会(SBU)。第7章。病假与精神障碍。
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:152-80. doi: 10.1080/14034950410021871.
7
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 10. Sickness presence.瑞典医疗保健技术评估委员会(SBU)。第10章。病假情况。
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:216-21. doi: 10.1080/14034950410021907.
8
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 6. Sickness absence due to back and neck disorders.瑞典医疗保健技术评估委员会(SBU)。第6章。因背部和颈部疾病导致的病假。
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:109-51. doi: 10.1080/14034950410021862.
9
Occupational health and general practice: from opportunities lost to opportunities capitalised?职业健康与全科医疗:从错失机遇到把握机遇?
Med Lav. 2006 Mar-Apr;97(2):288-94.
10
Sickness absence: causes, consequences, and physicians' sickness certification practice. A systematic literature review by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU).病假:原因、后果及医生的病假证明开具做法。瑞典医疗保健技术评估委员会(SBU)的系统文献综述
Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:3-263. doi: 10.1080/14034950410003826.

引用本文的文献

1
An education programme to increase general practitioners' awareness of their patients' employment: design of a cluster randomised controlled trial.一项提高全科医生对患者就业情况认知的教育项目:群组随机对照试验的设计
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Feb 7;15:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-28.
2
An intervention program with the aim to improve and maintain work productivity for workers with rheumatoid arthritis: design of a randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study.一项旨在提高和维持类风湿关节炎患者工作生产力的干预计划:一项随机对照试验和成本效益研究的设计。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 2;12:496. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-496.
3
Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial.
多学科护理方案对妇科手术后患者康复和重返工作的效果:一项随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb 1;12:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-29.
4
Work and health, a blind spot in curative healthcare? A pilot study.工作与健康,治疗性医疗保健的盲区?一项试点研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Sep;21(3):304-12. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9271-3.
5
Empowerment of disability benefit claimants through an interactive website: design of a randomized controlled trial.通过交互式网站增强残疾福利申领者的能力:一项随机对照试验的设计
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 May 10;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-23.