Mandarà Marta, Nortilli Rolando, Sava Teodoro, Cetto Gian Luigi
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Verona, P.le Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2006 Jan;6(1):121-30. doi: 10.1586/14737140.6.1.121.
Despite the limited efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, it remains the gold standard in the case of patients with a good performance status and no major comorbidities for whom radical surgery is unsuitable. Various drugs have been employed as monochemotherapy with response rates ranging from 0 to 20%. Many Phase III trials have compared the role of polychemotherapy with that of single-agent chemotherapy, or evaluated the impact of biological response modifiers alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. However, the current scenario does not seem to be significantly different from the situation of 20 or 30 years ago. To date, no single drug, combination chemotherapy in addition to a hormonal or biotherapy compound, has demonstrated an overall survival benefit in a randomized clinical trial.
尽管全身化疗在转移性黑色素瘤治疗中的疗效有限,但对于身体状况良好且无重大合并症、不适合进行根治性手术的患者而言,它仍是金标准。多种药物已被用作单一化疗药物,有效率在0%至20%之间。许多III期试验比较了多药化疗与单药化疗的作用,或评估了生物反应调节剂单独使用或与化疗药物联合使用的影响。然而,目前的情况似乎与20或30年前的情况没有显著差异。迄今为止,在随机临床试验中,没有一种单一药物、除激素或生物治疗化合物外的联合化疗方案显示出总生存获益。