Mansfield N J, Holmlund P, Lundström R, Lenzuni P, Nataletti P
Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK.
J Biomech. 2006;39(16):3062-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.024. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
Twelve seated male subjects were exposed to 15 vibration conditions to investigate the nature and mechanisms of the non-linearity in biomechanical response. Subjects were exposed to three groups of stimuli: Group A comprised three repeats of random vertical vibration at 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 ms(-2) r.m.s. with subjects sitting in a relaxed upright posture. Group B used the same vibration stimuli as Group A, but with subjects sitting in a 'tense' posture. Group C used vibration where the vibration spectrum was dominated by either low-frequency motion (2-7 Hz), high-frequency motion (7-20 Hz) or a 1.0 ms(-2) r.m.s. sinusoid at the frequency of the second peak in apparent mass (about 10-14 Hz) added to 0.5 ms(-2) r.m.s. random vibration. In the relaxed posture, frequencies of the primary peak in apparent mass decreased with increased vibration magnitude. In the tense posture, the extent of the non-linearity was reduced. For the low-frequency dominated stimulus, the primary peak frequency was lower than that for the high-frequency dominated stimulus indicating that the frequency of the primary peak in the apparent mass is dominated by the magnitude of the vibration encompassing the peak. Cross-axis transfer functions showed peaks of about 15-20% and 5% of the magnitudes of the peaks in the apparent mass for x- and y-direction transfer functions, respectively, in the relaxed posture. In the tense posture, cross-axis transfer functions reduced in magnitude with increased vibration, likely indicating a reduced fore-aft pitching of the body with increased tension, supporting the hypothesis that pitching contributes to the non-linearity in apparent mass.
12名男性受试者就座,暴露于15种振动条件下,以研究生物力学响应中的非线性特性及机制。受试者暴露于三组刺激下:A组包括以0.5、1.0和1.5 ms(-2)均方根值进行的三次随机垂直振动重复,受试者以放松的直立姿势就座。B组使用与A组相同的振动刺激,但受试者以“紧张”姿势就座。C组使用的振动中,振动频谱由低频运动(2 - 7 Hz)、高频运动(7 - 20 Hz)主导,或者在0.5 ms(-2)均方根值的随机振动上叠加表观质量第二个峰值频率(约10 - 14 Hz)处的1.0 ms(-2)均方根值正弦波。在放松姿势下,表观质量中主峰值的频率随振动幅度增加而降低。在紧张姿势下,非线性程度降低。对于低频主导的刺激,主峰值频率低于高频主导的刺激,这表明表观质量中主峰值的频率由包含该峰值的振动幅度主导。交叉轴传递函数显示,在放松姿势下,x方向和y方向传递函数的峰值分别约为表观质量峰值幅度的15% - 20%和5%。在紧张姿势下,交叉轴传递函数的幅度随振动增加而减小,这可能表明随着张力增加,身体前后俯仰减小,支持了俯仰导致表观质量非线性的假设。