Polyzos Nikolaos P, Pavlidis Nicholas, Paraskevaidis Evangelos, Ioannidis John P A
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina 45110, Greece.
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Feb;42(3):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.026. Epub 2006 Jan 11.
Several chemotherapy and hormonal therapy regimens have been used in advanced endometrial cancer. In this review we have systematically evaluated the available data from randomized trials on survival. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library (last search April 2005) for randomized controlled trials evaluating various chemotherapy or hormonal therapy regimens in locally advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer. We focused on survival outcomes and examined trial characteristics pertaining to quality and potential biases. Across 17 eligible trials (2964 patients randomized), only 4 regimens were involved in more than one trial, and only two trials had used the same comparison of regimens. A statistically significant effect in survival was seen only in one recent trial, but it was borderline (P = 0.032) and amounted to only 3 months difference in median survival. Three more trials reported some survival benefits, but these were seen only after specific adjustments, and the difference was against the experimental arm in one of these three trials. Only four trials (24%) apparently analyzed all randomized patients and none of the trials were blinded. Median survival was seemingly longer in more recent compared with older trials, but this effect was driven by the inclusion of significantly fewer patients with poor performance status in more recent trials (P < 0.001). Overall, randomized evidence on systemic treatment in advanced endometrial cancer is fragmented and survival benefits for specific regimens are questionable.
几种化疗和激素治疗方案已用于晚期子宫内膜癌。在本综述中,我们系统评估了随机试验中关于生存情况的现有数据。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆(最后检索时间为2005年4月),以查找评估局部晚期或转移性子宫内膜癌各种化疗或激素治疗方案的随机对照试验。我们关注生存结果,并检查与质量和潜在偏倚相关的试验特征。在17项符合条件的试验(2964例患者随机分组)中,只有4种方案被用于一项以上试验,且只有两项试验使用了相同的方案比较。仅在一项近期试验中观察到生存方面具有统计学意义的效果,但该效果接近临界值(P = 0.032),中位生存差异仅为3个月。另外三项试验报告了一些生存获益,但这些仅在进行特定调整后才可见,且在这三项试验中的一项试验中,差异对试验组不利。只有四项试验(24%)显然分析了所有随机分组的患者,且没有一项试验采用盲法。与较旧的试验相比,近期试验中的中位生存时间似乎更长,但这种效果是由于近期试验中纳入的身体状况较差的患者明显较少所致(P < 0.001)。总体而言,晚期子宫内膜癌全身治疗的随机证据零散,特定方案的生存获益值得怀疑。