McMeekin D Scott, Filiaci Virginia L, Thigpen J Tate, Gallion Holly H, Fleming Gini F, Rodgers William H
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jul;106(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.04.032.
To explore associations between histology and outcome in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients participating in Gynecologic Oncology Group chemotherapy trials.
Age, race, performance status, histologic type (serous=S; clear cell=CC; endometrioid=E), disease stage, and prior radiation were evaluated using various analytic methods to evaluate the probability of response and identify independent predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Single agent or combination chemotherapy regimens including doxorubicin (A) (12%), doxorubicin/cisplatin (AP) (63%), doxorubicin/paclitaxel (AT) (13%), and paclitaxel/doxorubicin/cisplatin (TAP) (11%) were used among 1203 patients treated on 4 randomized clinical trials. Breakdown of disease stage was 7.8% stage III, 22.8% stage IV, and 69.4% recurrent disease. Histologic distribution was 18% S, 3.7% CC, 8.5% mixed, 51.7% E and 18.1% other. More S/CC patients enrolled on trials with advanced stage (III-IV) disease (as opposed to recurrent disease) compared to E patients (45% vs. 24%, p<0.05). Overall response rate was 42% (E=44%, S=44%, CC=32%). Histologic type was not an independent predictor of response. Independent predictors of PFS included race, performance status, disease stage, and CC histology. Histology was also an independent predictor of OS; the relative hazard ratio for S histology was 1.2 (1.02-1.4; p=0.03), and for CC was 1.51 (1.1-2.07; p=0.01).
In patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer treated with A, P and/or T, response was not associated with histology. This exploratory analysis does not support exclusion of S tumors in future trials. Poorer PFS and OS were observed in CC compared to other types, but a lack of benefit from chemotherapy was not shown, and as this histology represents such a small fraction, it does not seem feasible to have separate chemotherapy trials for CC.
探讨参与妇科肿瘤学组化疗试验的晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌患者的组织学与预后之间的关联。
采用多种分析方法评估年龄、种族、体能状态、组织学类型(浆液性=S;透明细胞=CC;子宫内膜样=E)、疾病分期和既往放疗情况,以评估缓解概率并确定无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的独立预测因素。
在4项随机临床试验中接受治疗的1203例患者中,使用了包括阿霉素(A)(12%)、阿霉素/顺铂(AP)(63%)、阿霉素/紫杉醇(AT)(13%)和紫杉醇/阿霉素/顺铂(TAP)(11%)的单药或联合化疗方案。疾病分期分布为Ⅲ期7.8%、Ⅳ期22.8%、复发性疾病69.4%。组织学分布为S型18%、CC型3.7%、混合型8.5%、E型51.7%、其他型18.1%。与E型患者相比,更多S/CC型患者入组晚期(Ⅲ-Ⅳ期)疾病(而非复发性疾病)的试验(45%对24%,p<0.05)。总缓解率为42%(E型=44%,S型=44%,CC型=32%)。组织学类型不是缓解的独立预测因素。PFS的独立预测因素包括种族、体能状态、疾病分期和CC组织学。组织学也是OS的独立预测因素;S组织学的相对风险比为1.2(1.02-1.4;p=0.03),CC组织学的相对风险比为1.51(1.1-2.07;p=0.01)。
在接受A、P和/或T治疗的晚期/复发性子宫内膜癌患者中,缓解与组织学无关。这项探索性分析不支持在未来试验中排除S肿瘤。与其他类型相比,CC型患者的PFS和OS较差,但未显示出化疗无获益,且由于这种组织学类型所占比例很小,针对CC型进行单独的化疗试验似乎不可行。