Roscitano Antonino, Benedetto Umberto, Sciangula Alfonso, Merico Eusebio, Barberi Filippo, Bianchini Roberto, Tonelli Euclide, Sinatra Riccardo
Division of Cardiac Surgery, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza, Via di Grottarossa 1035, Rome 00181, Italy.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Feb;29(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.11.007. Epub 2006 Jan 11.
After aortic valve replacement, the effects of a small functional prosthesis on the extent and pattern of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and on clinical outcomes may be less significant in older patients with low cardiac output requirements. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether patient-prosthesis mismatch affects left ventricular mass regression in the elderly.
The population studied was made up of 88 patients over 65 years of age with pure aortic stenosis who underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement. The effective orifice area index was calculated for each patient on the basis of the projected prosthesis in vivo effective orifice area. It was considered a continuous variable and influence of its entire range of values on the extent of left ventricular mass regression was analyzed in a multivariate prediction model.
Even though, in the group with prosthesis-patient mismatch there was a trend for lower postoperative left ventricular mass index (115+/-24 g/m(2) vs 102+/-27 g/m(2), p=0.24) and postoperative peak trans-prosthetic gradients (32+/-9.8 mmHg vs 28.9+/-7.79 mmHg, p=0.35) these differences were not statistically significant. The prevalence of residual left ventricular hypertrophy at follow-up was 50% in the group with patient-prosthesis mismatch and 50% in the group without patient-prosthesis mismatch (p=0.83). In multivariate analysis the only factors associated with indexed left ventricular mass were the follow-up time (p=0.015, r(2)=0.22) and preoperative indexed left ventricular mass (p=0.0012, r(2)=0.11).
The major finding of our study is that patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect left ventricular mass regression in patients older than 65 with pure aortic stenosis who underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement. In older patients with low cardiac output requirements, even a small change in the valve effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement with modern efficient mechanical prosthesis, will result in a marked reduction of pressure gradient and this will be associated with a significant regression of left ventricular mass.
在主动脉瓣置换术后,对于心输出量需求较低的老年患者,小型功能性人工瓣膜对左心室肥厚消退的程度和模式以及临床结局的影响可能较小。因此,本研究的目的是确定患者-人工瓣膜不匹配是否会影响老年人的左心室质量消退。
研究人群由88例65岁以上的单纯主动脉瓣狭窄患者组成,这些患者接受了机械主动脉瓣置换术。根据体内人工瓣膜的预计有效瓣口面积为每位患者计算有效瓣口面积指数。将其视为连续变量,并在多变量预测模型中分析其整个取值范围对左心室质量消退程度的影响。
尽管在人工瓣膜-患者不匹配组中,术后左心室质量指数有降低趋势(115±24g/m²对102±27g/m²,p=0.24),术后跨人工瓣膜峰值梯度也有降低趋势(32±9.8mmHg对28.9±7.79mmHg,p=0.35),但这些差异无统计学意义。随访时残余左心室肥厚的发生率在人工瓣膜-患者不匹配组为50%,在无人工瓣膜-患者不匹配组也为50%(p=0.83)。在多变量分析中,与左心室质量指数相关的唯一因素是随访时间(p=0.015,r²=0.22)和术前左心室质量指数(p=0.0012,r²=0.11)。
我们研究的主要发现是,患者-人工瓣膜不匹配不会影响65岁以上接受机械主动脉瓣置换术的单纯主动脉瓣狭窄患者的左心室质量消退。对于心输出量需求较低的老年患者,即使在使用现代高效机械人工瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术后瓣膜有效瓣口面积有微小变化,也会导致压力梯度显著降低,这将与左心室质量的显著消退相关。