Rogawski Michael A
Epilepsy Res. 2006 Jan;68(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.09.012.
Animal models have played a key role in the discovery and characterization of all marketed antiepileptic drugs (AED). The conventional wisdom is that the standard animal screening models are becoming obsolete because they fail to identify compounds that act in mechanistically new ways and as a result do not offer therapeutic advantages over presently available agents. In fact, far from only detecting me-too drugs, the models often uncover compounds with distinctive profiles of activity in various types of epilepsy and in addition have unexpected efficacy in non-epilepsy conditions, such as neuropathic pain, bipolar disorder, and migraine. Moreover, the animal models-because they are unbiased with respect to mechanism-provide an opportunity to uncover drugs that act in new ways and through new targets, such as alpha2delta and SV2A. In vitro testing is not likely to replace screening in animal models because in vitro systems cannot model the specific pharmacodynamic actions required for seizure protection, and do not assess bioavailability and brain accessibility.
动物模型在所有已上市抗癫痫药物(AED)的发现和特性描述中发挥了关键作用。传统观点认为,标准的动物筛选模型正变得过时,因为它们无法识别以全新作用机制发挥作用的化合物,因此相较于现有药物并无治疗优势。事实上,这些模型远非只能检测仿制药,它们常常能发现对各类癫痫具有独特活性特征的化合物,此外在非癫痫病症(如神经性疼痛、双相情感障碍和偏头痛)中还具有意外疗效。而且,动物模型——因其对作用机制不具有偏向性——为发现以新方式并通过新靶点(如α2δ和SV2A)发挥作用的药物提供了机会。体外测试不太可能取代动物模型筛选,因为体外系统无法模拟癫痫保护所需的特定药效学作用,也无法评估生物利用度和脑内可达性。