Mainela-Arnold Elina, Evans Julia L
Waisman Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Aug;48(4):897-909. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/062).
Reduced verbal working memory capacity has been proposed as a possible account of language impairments in specific language impairment (SLI). Studies have shown, however, that differences in strength of linguistic representations in the form of word frequency affect list recall and performance on verbal working memory tasks. This suggests that verbal memory capacity and long-term linguistic knowledge may not be distinct constructs. It has been suggested that linguistic representations in SLI are weak in ways that result in a breakdown in language processing on tasks that require manipulation of unfamiliar material. In this study, the effects of word frequency, long-term linguistic knowledge, and serial order position on recall performance in the competing language processing task (CLPT) were investigated in 10 children with SLI and 10 age-matched peers (age 8 years 6 months to 12 years 4 months). The children with SLI recalled significantly fewer target words on the CLPT as compared with their age-matched controls. The SLI group did not differ, however, in their ability to recall target words having high word frequency but were significantly poorer in their ability to recall words on the CLPT having low word frequency. Differences in receptive and expressive language abilities also appeared closely related to performance on the CLPT, suggesting that working memory capacity is not distinct from language knowledge and that degraded linguistic representations may have an effect on performance on verbal working memory span tasks in children with SLI.
言语工作记忆容量降低被认为可能是特定语言障碍(SLI)中语言损伤的一个原因。然而,研究表明,以词频形式存在的语言表征强度差异会影响列表回忆以及言语工作记忆任务的表现。这表明言语记忆容量和长期语言知识可能并非不同的结构。有人提出,SLI中的语言表征较为薄弱,这导致在需要处理不熟悉材料的任务中语言处理出现障碍。在本研究中,对10名患有SLI的儿童和10名年龄匹配的同龄人(年龄在8岁6个月至12岁4个月之间)在竞争性语言处理任务(CLPT)中词频、长期语言知识和序列位置对回忆表现的影响进行了调查。与年龄匹配的对照组相比,患有SLI的儿童在CLPT上回忆出的目标词明显更少。然而,SLI组在回忆高频目标词的能力上没有差异,但在回忆CLPT上低频词的能力上明显更差。接受性和表达性语言能力的差异也似乎与CLPT的表现密切相关,这表明工作记忆容量与语言知识并非不同,并且退化的语言表征可能会影响患有SLI的儿童在言语工作记忆广度任务中的表现。