Lamprianou Iasonas
University of Manchester.
J Appl Meas. 2006;7(1):92-116.
A large number of papers and technical reports are published every year describing researches where Rasch models are used. It has been observed, however, that not all the authors describe the application of the Rasch measurement with the same thoroughness. Some authors may leave behind important bits of information e.g. they may fail to investigate the person or item fit or may even fail to discuss the reliability of measurement. As a result, editorial guidelines have been published in order to suggest an informal minimum of thoroughness with which the authors may describe the application of Rasch measurement in their papers. This study presents stages for the development of a scale to investigate the comprehensiveness with which individual papers describe the application of Rasch models in practical settings. The scale is used to evaluate how comprehensively the papers published by the Journal of Applied Measurement present the application of Rasch models.
每年都有大量的论文和技术报告发表,描述使用拉施模型的研究。然而,人们发现并非所有作者都以同样的详尽程度描述拉施测量的应用。一些作者可能遗漏重要信息,例如,他们可能未调查人员或项目拟合情况,甚至可能未讨论测量的可靠性。因此,已发布编辑指南,以建议作者在论文中描述拉施测量应用时应具备的非正式最低详尽程度。本研究提出了一个量表的开发阶段,以调查个别论文在实际环境中描述拉施模型应用的全面程度。该量表用于评估《应用测量杂志》发表的论文对拉施模型应用的描述有多全面。