Cimino James J
Department of Biomedical Informatic, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Biomed Inform. 2006 Jun;39(3):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.11.008. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
A 1998 paper that delineated desirable characteristics, or desiderata for controlled medical terminologies attempted to summarize emerging consensus regarding structural issues of such terminologies. Among the Desiderata was a call for terminologies to be "concept oriented." Since then, research has trended toward the extension of terminologies into ontologies. A paper by Smith, entitled "From Concepts to Clinical Reality: An Essay on the Benchmarking of Biomedical Terminologies" urges a realist approach that seeks terminologies composed of universals, rather than concepts. The current paper addresses issues raised by Smith and attempts to extend the Desiderata, not away from concepts, but towards recognition that concepts and universals must both be embraced and can coexist peaceably in controlled terminologies. To that end, additional Desiderata are defined that deal with the purpose, rather than the structure, of controlled medical terminologies.
一篇1998年的论文阐述了受控医学术语的理想特征或 desiderata,试图总结关于此类术语结构问题的新共识。Desiderata 之一是呼吁术语“以概念为导向”。从那时起,研究趋势是将术语扩展到本体论。史密斯的一篇题为《从概念到临床现实:关于生物医学术语基准的论文》的文章主张采用现实主义方法,即寻求由共相而非概念组成的术语。本文探讨了史密斯提出的问题,并试图扩展 Desiderata,不是远离概念,而是认识到概念和共相都必须被接受,并且可以在受控术语中和平共存。为此,定义了额外的 Desiderata,它们涉及受控医学术语的目的而非结构。