Suppr超能文献

硫酸镁在急性哮喘中的应用:北美急诊科对证据的迅速采纳

The use of magnesium sulfate in acute asthma: rapid uptake of evidence in North American emergency departments.

作者信息

Rowe Brian H, Camargo Carlos A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2B7.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jan;117(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.033. Epub 2005 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews of approximately 13 randomized trials support treatment with intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) in patients with severe acute asthma; however, little is known about its actual clinical use.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the use of intravenous MgSO(4) in the emergency department (ED) and physician attitudes toward its use.

METHODS

Data for MgSO(4) use were obtained from observational cohort studies of ED patients with acute asthma. Investigators were asked about MgSO(4) through a brief Internet-based survey. The main outcomes were the percentage of sites reporting MgSO(4) use and patient factors that potentially modified the use of this agent.

RESULTS

Among 9745 ED patients with acute asthma, 240 (2.5%) received MgSO(4). Increasing age, previous intubation, higher initial respiratory rate, lower initial PEF, higher number of beta-agonists in the ED, and use of systemic corticosteroids were associated with MgSO(4) use (P < .01). Overall, 103 (87%) of 119 potential sites completed the survey. Most (92%) respondents stated their EDs had MgSO(4) available, and 64% had recently used it. More respondents listed severity (96%) and failure to respond to initial beta-agonists (87%) as factors prompting their use of MgSO(4). Other factors, such as age, sex, and duration of exacerbation, less commonly influenced MgSO(4) use.

CONCLUSION

Most ED physicians accept the efficacy of MgSO(4) in acute asthma. Despite this belief and the ready availability of MgSO(4), its ED use remains uncommon (2.5% of cases). In both practice and theory, emergency physicians appear to appropriately restrict its use to patients with severe acute asthma.

摘要

背景

对约13项随机试验的系统评价支持对重度急性哮喘患者使用静脉注射硫酸镁(MgSO₄);然而,对其实际临床应用知之甚少。

目的

我们试图研究急诊科(ED)静脉注射MgSO₄的使用情况以及医生对其使用的态度。

方法

MgSO₄使用的数据来自对急性哮喘ED患者的观察性队列研究。通过简短的基于互联网的调查询问研究者关于MgSO₄的情况。主要结局是报告使用MgSO₄的机构比例以及可能影响该药物使用的患者因素。

结果

在9745例急性哮喘ED患者中,240例(2.5%)接受了MgSO₄治疗。年龄增加、既往插管史、初始呼吸频率较高、初始呼气峰流速较低、在ED中使用β受体激动剂的次数较多以及使用全身糖皮质激素与MgSO₄的使用相关(P <.01)。总体而言,119个潜在机构中有103个(87%)完成了调查。大多数(92%)受访者表示其所在的ED有MgSO₄可用,且64%最近使用过。更多受访者将病情严重程度(96%)和对初始β受体激动剂无反应(87%)列为促使他们使用MgSO₄的因素。其他因素,如年龄、性别和加重持续时间,较少影响MgSO₄的使用。

结论

大多数ED医生认可MgSO₄在急性哮喘中的疗效。尽管有这种认识且MgSO₄随时可用,但其在ED中的使用仍然不常见(2.5%的病例)。在实践和理论中,急诊医生似乎都适当地将其使用限制于重度急性哮喘患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验