Suppr超能文献

雾化吸入丙酸氟替卡松对因支气管哮喘发作而入住急诊科的成年患者的疗效。

Efficacy of nebulized fluticasone propionate in adult patients admitted to the emergency department due to bronchial asthma attack.

作者信息

Starobin Daniel, Bolotinsky Ludmila, Or Jack, Fink Gershon, Shtoeger Zev

机构信息

Pulmonary Institute, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

出版信息

Isr Med Assoc J. 2008 Aug-Sep;10(8-9):568-71.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Locally delivered steroids by inhalers or nebulizers have been shown in small trials to be effective in acute asthma attack, but evidence-based data are insufficient to establish their place as routine management of adult asthma attacks.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of nebulized compared to systemic steroids in adult asthmatics admitted to the emergency department following an acute attack.

METHODS

Adult asthmatics admitted to the ED were assigned in random consecutive case fashion to one of three protocol groups: group 1--nebulized steroid fluticasone (Flixotide Nebules), group 2--intravenous methylprednisolone, group 3--combined treatment by both routes. Objective and subjective parameters, such as peak expiratory flow, oxygen saturation, heart rate and dyspnea score, were registered before and 2 hours after ED treatment was initiated. Steroids were continued for 1 week following the ED visit according to the protocol arm. Data on hospital admission/discharge rate, ED readmissions in the week after enrollment and other major events related to asthma were registered.

RESULTS

Altogether, 73 adult asthmatics were assigned to receive treatment: 24 patients in group 1, 23 in group 2 and 26 in group 3. Mean age was 44.4 +/- 16.8 years (range 17-75 years). Peak expiratory flow and dyspnea score significantly improved in group 1 patients compared with patients in the other groups after 2 hours of ED treatment (P = 0.021 and 0.009, respectively). The discharge rate after ED treatment was significantly higher in groups 1 and 3 than in group 2 (P = 0.05). All 73 patients were alive a week after enrollment. Five patients (20.8%) in the Flixotide treatment arm were hospitalized and required additional systemic steroids. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting hospitalization rate demonstrated that severity of asthma (odds ratio 8.11) and group 2 (OD 4.17) had a negative effect, whereas adherence to chronic anti-asthma therapy (OD 0.49) reduced the hospitalization rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study cohort showed the advantage of nebulized steroid fluticasone versus systemic corticosteroids in adult asthmatics managed in the ED following an acute attack. Both these and previous results suggest that nebulized steroids should be used, either alone or in combination with systemic steroids, to treat adults suffering acute asthma attack.

摘要

背景

吸入器或雾化器局部给予类固醇在小型试验中已显示对急性哮喘发作有效,但循证数据不足以确立其作为成人哮喘发作常规治疗方法的地位。

目的

确定在急性发作后入住急诊科的成年哮喘患者中,雾化类固醇与全身用类固醇相比的疗效。

方法

将入住急诊科的成年哮喘患者以随机连续病例的方式分配到三个方案组之一:第1组——雾化类固醇氟替卡松(辅舒酮雾化吸入溶液),第2组——静脉注射甲泼尼龙,第3组——两种途径联合治疗。在急诊科治疗开始前及开始后2小时记录客观和主观参数,如呼气峰值流速、血氧饱和度、心率和呼吸困难评分。根据方案组,在急诊科就诊后类固醇持续使用1周。记录入院/出院率、入组后一周内急诊科再次入院情况以及其他与哮喘相关的重大事件的数据。

结果

总共73名成年哮喘患者被分配接受治疗:第1组24例患者,第2组23例患者,第3组26例患者。平均年龄为44.4±16.8岁(范围17 - 75岁)。在急诊科治疗2小时后,第1组患者的呼气峰值流速和呼吸困难评分与其他组患者相比有显著改善(分别为P = 0.021和0.009)。第1组和第3组在急诊科治疗后的出院率显著高于第2组(P = 0.05)。所有7名患者在入组一周后均存活。辅舒酮治疗组中有5名患者(20.8%)住院并需要额外的全身用类固醇。对影响住院率的因素进行多变量分析表明,哮喘严重程度(比值比8.11)和第2组(比值比4.17)有负面影响,而坚持慢性抗哮喘治疗(比值比0.49)可降低住院率。

结论

我们的研究队列显示,在急性发作后于急诊科接受治疗的成年哮喘患者中,雾化类固醇氟替卡松优于全身用皮质类固醇。这些结果以及之前的结果均表明,雾化类固醇应单独使用或与全身用类固醇联合使用,以治疗成年急性哮喘发作患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验