Lefebvre Geneviève, Angers Jean-François, Blais Lucie
Mathematics and Statistics Department, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 May;15(5):304-16. doi: 10.1002/pds.1201.
In pharmacoepidemiology, it is well recognized that the rate of adverse events may vary as a function of the cumulative duration of the drug exposure and/or the time since the end of the exposure. In case-control studies, two different approaches have been used to estimate temporal effects of drug exposure: the time-windows (T-Ws) approach and the duration-specific (D-S) approach. We decided to conduct a simulation study to compare the two approaches when the rate ratios (RRs) vary as a function of the cumulative duration of exposure and/or the time since the end of exposure.
We generated three cohorts of 500,000 individuals in which the rate of the event was varying as a function of the cumulative duration of exposure and the time since the end of exposure. For each cohort, a nested case-control analysis was performed using both the D-S and the T-Ws approaches. In the T-Ws approach, a RR is estimated within specific periods of time prior to the outcome, while a RR is estimated within periods of cumulative duration of exposure and time since the end of exposure in the D-S approach.
We found that the RRs obtained from the D-S approach exactly corresponded to the RRs obtained from the cohort analyses, while the RRs obtained from the T-Ws approach generally not. RRs obtained from the T-Ws approach were difficult to interpret in terms of the effect of the duration and timing of the exposure.
The D-S approach should be used to investigate the duration-related effects of exposure in case-control studies.
在药物流行病学中,人们普遍认识到不良事件的发生率可能会随着药物暴露的累积持续时间和/或暴露结束后的时间而变化。在病例对照研究中,已经使用了两种不同的方法来估计药物暴露的时间效应:时间窗(T-Ws)方法和持续时间特异性(D-S)方法。我们决定进行一项模拟研究,以比较当率比(RRs)随暴露的累积持续时间和/或暴露结束后的时间而变化时,这两种方法的差异。
我们生成了三组各500,000人的队列,其中事件发生率随暴露的累积持续时间和暴露结束后的时间而变化。对于每个队列,使用D-S方法和T-Ws方法进行了巢式病例对照分析。在T-Ws方法中,在结局发生前的特定时间段内估计RR,而在D-S方法中,在暴露的累积持续时间和暴露结束后的时间段内估计RR。
我们发现,从D-S方法获得的RR与从队列分析获得的RR完全一致,而从T-Ws方法获得的RR通常不一致。从T-Ws方法获得的RR难以从暴露的持续时间和时间的影响方面进行解释。
在病例对照研究中,应使用D-S方法来研究暴露的持续时间相关效应。