Suppr超能文献

[儿科精神药物处方:批准的适应症和治疗前景]

[Prescription of psychotropic drugs in paediatry: approved indications and therapeutic perspectives].

作者信息

Dumortier G, Welniarz B, Sauvebois C, Medjdoub H, Friche H, Siad N, Degrassat K

机构信息

Service Pharmacie, EPS de Ville-Evrard, 202, avenue Jean-Jauèbs, 93332 Neuilly-sur-Marne.

出版信息

Encephale. 2005 Jul-Aug;31(4 Pt 1):477-89. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82409-1.

Abstract

In France, psychotropic drugs may be classified in four categories according to their official data. The first category corresponds to psychotropic drugs with an approved indication available in paediatry. Theyare old agents (e.g. haloperidol, amitriptyline, benzodiazepines...) with the exception of methylphenidate (hyperactivity). The second one corresponds to pharmacological agents approved for some indications obtained with adults but not for a1l (i.e. restricted indication: e.g. sertraline approved in paediatry only for OCD but not for depression, risperidone approved only for the treatment of disruptive behaviors in children with subaverage IQs). For the third category, the psychotropic agent is either contraindicated or unadvised under the age of 15 or 18 years, by lack of data (e.g. most of SSRI or atypical antipsychotic drugs). For the last category, official data available in brief summaries offer no information on paediatric use and consequently their administration does not appear possible. Up to now, no approved use has been delivered to injection route (IM or IV) in France, except for an IM formulation of zuclopenthixol. Prescribing psychotropic drug has to respect good practices including close psychological and somatic monitoring that associates the young patient and his relative (psycho-education program). Particular key-points should be taken into consideration (i.e. pharmacokinetic and physiological specificities, risk of false passage under the age of 6 years with capsules or tablets, presence of alcohol in some oral solution or bitter aroma...). Beside these official data, many studies have been published but must be carefully interpreted according to their level of pertinence. Meta-analysis gather all randomised controlled trials published or not, analyse their specific pertinence and thus provide clinically relevant elements. Randomised controlled trials present clinical interest but key-points in study design must be checked (e.g. number of patients, inclusion and exclusion criteria, length of the study and clinical relevance of clinical scales...). Other studies like open trials or clinical cases do not offersufficient guarantees. Some randomised controlled trials of clinical relevance have been carried out in this population with new pharmacological classes (eg SSRI, atypical antipsychotic drugs) and may lead to extended indications in children and adolescents. According to bibliographic and official data, the main criteria in the prescribing choice may take into consideration the following sis stressing a poor benefit/risk ratio. SSRI may offer better prospects but their use has not been approved in this indication, until now. In OCD, sertraline shows great interest to enhance clinical response and represents the molecule of reference. No drug has been approved for mood disorders in children or adolescent, in France, contrary to USA where lithium can be administered over the age of 12 years. In addition, antiepileptic drugs like carbamazepine or divalproate have conducted to clinical improvement in some studies. Benzodiazepines, hydroxyzine and meprobamate use should be strictly restricted in case of anxiety symptoms but are the only agents approved in this indication despise promising results obtained with SSRI. Transitory insomnia may take advantage of alimemazine prescription (approved use over the age of 36 months). Some typical neuroleptics are indicated in tics or in behaviour disorders associated to autism or related syndromes but present clinical limitations and poor tolerability. Promising clinical trials (randomised or not) have been conducted with new atypical antipsychotic drugs like risperidone. In conclusion, present data available for paediatric use of psychotropic agents emphasizes that safety and effectiveness are not always well established in particular for the treatment of chronic disorders (long term tolerability assessment). Moreover, studies should be carried out to specify factors promoting adherence and quality of life for this young population in order to optimise clinical benefit of drug prescription.

摘要

在法国,根据官方数据,精神药物可分为四类。第一类对应于在儿科有批准适应症的精神药物。它们是旧药(如氟哌啶醇、阿米替林、苯二氮卓类药物等),但哌甲酯(用于治疗多动症)除外。第二类对应于已批准用于某些成人适应症但并非所有适应症(即适应症受限:例如,舍曲林在儿科仅被批准用于强迫症,而非抑郁症;利培酮仅被批准用于治疗智商低于平均水平儿童的破坏性行为)的药物。对于第三类,由于缺乏数据,15岁或18岁以下儿童禁用或不建议使用该精神药物(例如,大多数选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂或非典型抗精神病药物)。对于最后一类,简要摘要中的官方数据未提供有关儿科使用的信息,因此似乎无法给药。到目前为止,在法国除了氯哌噻吨的肌内注射制剂外,尚无批准的注射用(肌内注射或静脉注射)制剂。开具精神药物必须遵循良好的规范,包括对年轻患者及其亲属进行密切的心理和身体监测(心理教育计划)。应考虑一些特别要点(即药代动力学和生理特异性、6岁以下儿童使用胶囊或片剂时误服的风险、某些口服溶液中含酒精或有苦味等)。除了这些官方数据外,已经发表了许多研究,但必须根据其相关性水平进行仔细解读。荟萃分析收集所有已发表或未发表的随机对照试验,分析其特定相关性,从而提供临床相关要素。随机对照试验具有临床意义,但必须检查研究设计中的要点(例如患者数量、纳入和排除标准、研究时长以及临床量表的临床相关性等)。其他研究,如开放试验或临床病例,不能提供足够的保障。已经针对该人群使用新的药物类别(如选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、非典型抗精神病药物)开展了一些具有临床相关性的随机对照试验,可能会导致儿童和青少年的适应症扩大。根据文献和官方数据,处方选择的主要标准可能会考虑以下几点,强调不良的效益/风险比。选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂可能有更好的前景,但到目前为止,其在该适应症中的使用尚未获得批准。在强迫症中,舍曲林在增强临床反应方面表现出极大的优势,是参考药物。在法国,与美国不同(在美国12岁以上可使用锂盐),尚无药物被批准用于治疗儿童或青少年的情绪障碍。此外,在一些研究中,卡马西平或丙戊酸盐等抗癫痫药物已取得临床改善效果。在出现焦虑症状时,应严格限制使用苯二氮卓类药物、羟嗪和甲丙氨酯,尽管选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂取得了有前景的结果,但它们是该适应症中唯一被批准的药物。短暂性失眠可使用异丁嗪处方(36个月以上批准使用)。一些典型抗精神病药物可用于治疗抽动症或与自闭症或相关综合征相关的行为障碍,但存在临床局限性和耐受性差的问题。已经针对利培酮等新型非典型抗精神病药物开展了有前景的临床试验(随机或非随机)。总之,目前关于精神药物儿科使用的数据强调,安全性和有效性在某些情况下,尤其是治疗慢性疾病(长期耐受性评估)时,并不总是很明确。此外,应该开展研究以明确促进该年轻人群依从性和生活质量优化的因素,从而优化药物处方的临床效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验