• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在STAR*D研究中采用基于测量的护理评估西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的疗效:对临床实践的启示

Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.

作者信息

Trivedi Madhukar H, Rush A John, Wisniewski Stephen R, Nierenberg Andrew A, Warden Diane, Ritz Louise, Norquist Grayson, Howland Robert H, Lebowitz Barry, McGrath Patrick J, Shores-Wilson Kathy, Biggs Melanie M, Balasubramani G K, Fava Maurizio

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Exchange Park Express, American General Tower, 6363 Forest Park Rd., Suite 1300, Dallas, TX 75390-9119, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28
PMID:16390886
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used to treat depression, but the rates, timing, and baseline predictors of remission in "real world" patients are not established. The authors' primary objectives in this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of citalopram, an SSRI, using measurement-based care in actual practice, and to identify predictors of symptom remission in outpatients with major depressive disorder.

METHOD

This clinical study included outpatients with major depressive disorder who were treated in 23 psychiatric and 18 primary care "real world" settings. The patients received flexible doses of citalopram prescribed by clinicians for up to 14 weeks. The clinicians were assisted by a clinical research coordinator in the application of measurement-based care, which included the routine measurement of symptoms and side effects at each treatment visit and the use of a treatment manual that described when and how to modify medication doses based on these measures. Remission was defined as an exit score of <or=7 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) (primary outcome) or a score of <or=5 on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Report (QIDS-SR) (secondary outcome). Response was defined as a reduction of >or=50% in baseline QIDS-SR score.

RESULTS

Nearly 80% of the 2,876 outpatients in the analyzed sample had chronic or recurrent major depression; most also had a number of comorbid general medical and psychiatric conditions. The mean exit citalopram dose was 41.8 mg/day. Remission rates were 28% (HAM-D) and 33% (QIDS-SR). The response rate was 47% (QIDS-SR). Patients in primary and psychiatric care settings did not differ in remission or response rates. A substantial portion of participants who achieved either response or remission at study exit did so at or after 8 weeks of treatment. Participants who were Caucasian, female, employed, or had higher levels of education or income had higher HAM-D remission rates; longer index episodes, more concurrent psychiatric disorders (especially anxiety disorders or drug abuse), more general medical disorders, and lower baseline function and quality of life were associated with lower HAM-D remission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The response and remission rates in this highly generalizable sample with substantial axis I and axis III comorbidity closely resemble those seen in 8-week efficacy trials. The systematic use of easily implemented measurement-based care procedures may have assisted in achieving these results.

摘要

目的

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)被广泛用于治疗抑郁症,但“现实世界”中患者的缓解率、缓解时间及缓解的基线预测因素尚未明确。作者开展本研究的主要目的是在实际临床中采用基于测量的护理方法评估SSRI之一的西酞普兰的疗效,并确定重度抑郁症门诊患者症状缓解的预测因素。

方法

本临床研究纳入了在23个精神科和18个初级保健“现实世界”机构接受治疗的重度抑郁症门诊患者。患者接受临床医生开具的灵活剂量的西酞普兰治疗,为期14周。临床研究协调员协助临床医生应用基于测量的护理方法,包括在每次治疗访视时常规测量症状和副作用,并使用一本治疗手册,该手册描述了如何根据这些测量结果确定何时以及如何调整药物剂量。缓解定义为17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)的退出分数≤7分(主要结局)或16项抑郁症状快速自评量表(QIDS-SR)的分数≤5分(次要结局)。反应定义为基线QIDS-SR分数降低≥50%。

结果

分析样本中的2876名门诊患者中,近80%患有慢性或复发性重度抑郁症;大多数患者还伴有多种共病的普通内科和精神科疾病。西酞普兰的平均退出剂量为41.8毫克/天。缓解率分别为28%(HAM-D)和33%(QIDS-SR)。反应率为47%(QIDS-SR)。初级保健机构和精神科机构的患者在缓解率或反应率方面没有差异。在研究结束时达到反应或缓解的参与者中,很大一部分是在治疗8周及以后实现的。白人、女性、就业、或教育水平或收入较高的参与者HAM-D缓解率较高;病程较长、并发更多精神障碍(尤其是焦虑症或药物滥用)、更多普通内科疾病以及较低的基线功能和生活质量与较低的HAM-D缓解率相关。

结论

在这个具有大量轴I和轴III共病的高度可推广样本中,反应率和缓解率与8周疗效试验中的情况非常相似。系统使用易于实施的基于测量的护理程序可能有助于取得这些结果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.在STAR*D研究中采用基于测量的护理评估西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的疗效:对临床实践的启示
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.
2
Does the duration of index episode affect the treatment outcome of major depressive disorder? A STAR*D report.索引发作的持续时间是否会影响重度抑郁症的治疗结果?一项STAR*D报告。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;69(8):1246-56. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0807.
3
Primary versus specialty care outcomes for depressed outpatients managed with measurement-based care: results from STAR*D.采用基于测量的照护管理的抑郁症门诊患者的初级护理与专科护理结局:STAR*D研究结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):551-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0522-3. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
4
Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report.伴有焦虑的门诊抑郁症患者与无焦虑抑郁症患者治疗结果的差异:一项STAR*D报告
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;165(3):342-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111868. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
5
A comparison of mirtazapine and nortriptyline following two consecutive failed medication treatments for depressed outpatients: a STAR*D report.米氮平与去甲替林对门诊抑郁症患者连续两次药物治疗失败后的疗效比较:一项STAR*D报告
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;163(7):1161-72. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.7.1161.
6
The impact of chronic depression on acute and long-term outcomes in a randomized trial comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy versus each of 2 different antidepressant medication combinations.在一项比较选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂单药治疗与两种不同抗抑郁药物联合治疗的随机试验中,慢性抑郁症对急性和长期结局的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):967-76. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07043. Epub 2012 May 29.
7
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗抑郁症失败后的药物增效治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1243-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052964.
8
Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics associated with worsened depression during treatment with citalopram: results of the NIMH STAR(*)D trial.在西酞普兰治疗期间与抑郁症状加重相关的社会人口学、临床及治疗特征:美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症症状改善及缓解研究(NIMH STAR(*)D)试验结果
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(7):612-21. doi: 10.1002/da.20568.
9
Venlafaxine extended release versus citalopram in patients with depression unresponsive to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.对于对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无反应的抑郁症患者,文拉法辛缓释剂与西酞普兰的对比研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):113-9. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f424c2.
10
Impact of fatigue on outcome of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment: secondary analysis of STAR*D.疲劳对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗结果的影响:STAR*D研究的二次分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Oct;30(10):2109-18. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.936553. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards causal inference-based antidepressant selection with brain and blood biomarkers.迈向基于因果推断的抗抑郁药选择:借助脑和血液生物标志物
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02183-3.
2
Real-World Disability Outcomes Among Patients Treated with Cariprazine vs Other Atypical Antipsychotics as Adjunctive Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder.卡立普嗪与其他非典型抗精神病药物作为重度抑郁症辅助治疗的真实世界残疾结局
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Aug 28;17:585-600. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S522756. eCollection 2025.
3
Unveiling the enigma of anxiety disorders and depression: from pathogenesis to treatment.
揭开焦虑症和抑郁症之谜:从发病机制到治疗
Sci China Life Sci. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s11427-025-3024-y.
4
The Relationship Between Physical Activity and Depression in College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.大学生身体活动与抑郁之间的关系:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Brain Sci. 2025 Aug 18;15(8):875. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080875.
5
New and emerging pharmacologic treatments for MDD.抑郁症的新型及新兴药物治疗方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 8;16:1621887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1621887. eCollection 2025.
6
Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17,938 ameliorates LPS-induced depression-like and anxiety-like behaviors by modulating gut microbiota and brain metabolic function.罗伊氏乳杆菌DSM 17938通过调节肠道微生物群和脑代谢功能改善脂多糖诱导的抑郁样和焦虑样行为。
Gut Pathog. 2025 Aug 21;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13099-025-00739-8.
7
Are behavioural and inflammatory profiles different according to type of stressor, developmental stage, and sex in rodent models of depression? A systematic review.在抑郁症啮齿动物模型中,行为和炎症特征是否因应激源类型、发育阶段和性别而异?一项系统综述。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03138-2.
8
Treatment-resistant depression and intranasal esketamine: Spanish consensus on theoretical aspects.难治性抑郁症与鼻内用艾司氯胺酮:西班牙关于理论方面的共识
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 4;16:1623659. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1623659. eCollection 2025.
9
Treating major depressive disorder with an integrated mind-body intervention: Whole-body hyperthermia and cognitive behavioral therapy, a case report.采用身心综合干预治疗重度抑郁症:全身热疗与认知行为疗法,病例报告
Adv Integr Med. 2025 Sep;12(3). doi: 10.1016/j.aimed.2024.08.018. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
10
Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine plus naltrexone for major depression comorbid with alcohol use disorder: a randomized controlled trial.氯胺酮联合纳曲酮治疗合并酒精使用障碍的重度抑郁症的抗抑郁疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 Aug 1;28(8). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf056.