Suppr超能文献

仰卧位与俯卧位联合定量心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描:在无已知冠状动脉疾病患者中的方法开发与临床验证

Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Nishina Hidetaka, Slomka Piotr J, Abidov Aiden, Yoda Shunichi, Akincioglu Cigdem, Kang Xingping, Cohen Ishac, Hayes Sean W, Friedman John D, Germano Guido, Berman Daniel S

机构信息

Department of Imaging and CSMC Burns & Allen Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):51-8.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Acquisition in the prone position has been demonstrated to improve the specificity of visually analyzed myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the diagnostic value of prone imaging alone or combined acquisition has not been previously described using quantitative analysis.

METHODS

A total of 649 patients referred for MPS comprised the study population. Separate supine and prone normal limits were derived from 40 males and 40 females with a low likelihood (LLk) of CAD using a 3 average-deviation cutoff for all pixels on the polar map. These limits were applied to the test population of 369 consecutive patients (65% males; age, 65 +/- 13 y; 49% exercise stress) without known CAD who had diagnostic coronary angiography within 3 mo of MPS. Total perfusion deficit (TPD), defined as a product of defect extent and severity scores, was obtained for supine (S-TPD), prone (P-TPD), and combined supine-prone datasets (C-TPD). The angiographic group was randomly divided into 2 groups for deriving and validating optimal diagnostic cutoffs. Normalcy rates were validated in 2 additional groups of consecutive LLk patients: unselected patients (n = 100) and patients with body mass index >30 (n = 100).

RESULTS

C-TPD had a larger area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve than S-TPD or P-TPD for identification of stenosis >or=70% (0.86, 0.88, and 0.90 for S-TPD, P-TPD, and C-TPD, respectively; P < 0.05). In the validation group, sensitivity for P-TPD was lower than for S- or C-TPD (P < 0.05). C-TPD yielded higher specificity than S-TPD and a trend toward higher specificity than P-TPD (65%, 83%, and 86% for S-, P-, and C-TPD, respectively, P < 0.001; vs. S-TPD and P = 0.06 vs. P-TPD). Normalcy rates for C-TPD were higher than for S-TPD in obese LLk patients (78% vs. 95%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Combined supine-prone quantification significantly improves the area under the ROC curve and specificity of MPS in the identification of obstructive CAD compared with quantification of supine MPS alone.

摘要

未标注

已证明采用俯卧位采集可提高视觉分析心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层显像(MPS)检测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的特异性。然而,此前尚未使用定量分析描述单独俯卧位成像或联合采集的诊断价值。

方法

共有649例因MPS前来就诊的患者纳入研究人群。使用极坐标图上所有像素的3个平均偏差截断值,从40例男性和40例女性CAD可能性低(LLk)的患者中得出仰卧位和俯卧位各自的正常范围。将这些范围应用于369例连续的无CAD病史患者(65%为男性;年龄65±13岁;49%为运动负荷试验)的测试人群,这些患者在MPS检查后3个月内接受了诊断性冠状动脉造影。仰卧位(S-TPD)、俯卧位(P-TPD)和仰卧-俯卧联合数据集(C-TPD)均获得总灌注缺损(TPD),定义为缺损范围和严重程度评分的乘积。将血管造影组随机分为两组以得出并验证最佳诊断截断值。在另外两组连续的LLk患者中验证正常率:未选择的患者(n = 100)和体重指数>30的患者(n = 100)。

结果

在识别狭窄≥70%方面,C-TPD的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积大于S-TPD或P-TPD(S-TPD、P-TPD和C-TPD的曲线下面积分别为0.86、0.88和0.90;P<0.05)。在验证组中,P-TPD的敏感性低于S-TPD或C-TPD(P<0.05)。C-TPD的特异性高于S-TPD,且有高于P-TPD的趋势(S-TPD、P-TPD和C-TPD的特异性分别为65%、83%和86%,P<0.001;与S-TPD相比,与P-TPD相比P = 0.06)。肥胖LLk患者中C-TPD的正常率高于S-TPD(78%对95%,P<0.001)。

结论

与单独仰卧位MPS定量分析相比,仰卧-俯卧联合定量分析显著提高了ROC曲线下面积以及MPS在识别阻塞性CAD方面的特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验