McKee Michael D, Pedersen Elizabeth M, Jones Caroline, Stephen David J G, Kreder Hans J, Schemitsch Emil H, Wild Lisa M, Potter Jeffrey
Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto, 55 Queen Street East, Suite 800, Toronto, ON M5C 1R6, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):35-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02795.
Displaced fractures of the midpart of the clavicular shaft are generally treated nonoperatively, and few functional deficits have been reported. Whereas prior investigators have presented radiographic and surgeon-based outcomes, we used a patient-based outcome questionnaire and objective muscle-strength testing to evaluate a series of patients who had received nonoperative care for a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle.
We identified thirty patients (twenty-two men and eight women with a mean age of thirty-seven years) who had sustained a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle. All patients were treated nonoperatively. At a mean of fifty-five months, and a minimum of twelve months, outcomes were measured with the Constant shoulder score and the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) patient questionnaire. In addition, objective shoulder muscle-strength testing was performed with the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator, with the uninjured arm serving as a control.
The range of motion was well maintained, with flexion averaging 170 degrees +/- 20 degrees and abduction averaging 165 degrees +/- 25 degrees . Compared with the strength of the uninjured shoulder, the strength of the injured shoulder was reduced to 81% for maximum flexion, 75% for endurance of flexion, 82% for maximum abduction, 67% for endurance of abduction, 81% for maximum external rotation, 82% for endurance of external rotation, 85% for maximum internal rotation, and 78% for endurance of internal rotation (p < 0.05 for all values). The mean Constant score was 71 points, and the mean DASH score was 24.6 points, indicating substantial residual disability.
Traditionally, good results with minimal functional deficits have been reported following nonoperative treatment of clavicular fractures. However, surgeon-based methods of evaluation may be insensitive to loss of muscle strength. We detected residual deficits in shoulder strength and endurance in this patient population, which may be related to the significant level of dysfunction detected by the patient-based outcome measures.
锁骨中段移位骨折一般采用非手术治疗,且鲜有功能缺陷的报道。以往的研究者呈现的是基于影像学和外科医生的结果,而我们使用基于患者的结果问卷和客观的肌肉力量测试,来评估一系列因锁骨中段移位骨折接受非手术治疗的患者。
我们确定了30例患者(22例男性和8例女性,平均年龄37岁),他们均发生了锁骨中段移位骨折。所有患者均接受非手术治疗。平均随访55个月,最短12个月,采用Constant肩关节评分和DASH(上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍)患者问卷来评估结果。此外,使用巴尔的摩治疗设备工作模拟器进行客观的肩部肌肉力量测试,以未受伤的手臂作为对照。
活动范围保持良好,前屈平均为170度±20度,外展平均为165度±25度。与未受伤肩部的力量相比,受伤肩部的力量在最大前屈时降至81%,前屈耐力降至75%,最大外展时降至82%,外展耐力降至67%,最大外旋时降至81%,外旋耐力降至82%,最大内旋时降至85%,内旋耐力降至78%(所有值p<0.05)。Constant评分的平均值为71分,DASH评分的平均值为24.6分,表明存在明显的残留残疾。
传统上,锁骨骨折非手术治疗后报告的结果良好,功能缺陷最小。然而,基于外科医生的评估方法可能对肌肉力量的丧失不敏感。我们在这一患者群体中检测到肩部力量和耐力存在残留缺陷,这可能与基于患者的结果测量所检测到的明显功能障碍程度有关。