Guentner Kathleen, Hoffman Leslie A, Happ Mary Beth, Kim Yookyung, Dabbs Annette Devito, Mendelsohn Aaron B, Chelluri Lakshmipathi
Nursing Quality and Outcomes, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, USA.
Am J Crit Care. 2006 Jan;15(1):65-77.
Among survivors of prolonged mechanical ventilation, preferences for this treatment have rarely been explored.
To elicit preferences of survivors of prolonged mechanical ventilation (>or=7 days) and factors influencing these preferences.
A descriptive, cross-sectional survey design was used. Subjects were recruited from intensive care units in a tertiary care hospital and from long-term care facilities. Each subject (n = 30) was asked to reflect on the decision to use mechanical ventilation; rate current health, pain/discomfort in the intensive care unit and from mechanical ventilation, perceived family financial burden, and emotional/physical stress related to mechanical ventilation; identify changes that would influence preference for mechanical ventilation; and answer questions about quality of life, functional status, depressive symptoms, and communication.
Most subjects (75.9%) would have chosen mechanical ventilation. Median days of mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy were greater for subjects who would have chosen mechanical ventilation (98.5 vs 70), as were median days of tracheostomy (102 vs 64). Patients who would not have chosen mechanical ventilation had more depressive symptoms and were more likely to be insured by Medicare. No other variables differed between groups. Patients who preferred mechanical ventilation would change their preference on the basis of their families' emotional/physical stress and financial burden. Patients who did not prefer mechanical ventilation would change their preference if the family financial burden and emotional/physical stress were reduced and current health improved.
Most patients would have chosen mechanical ventilation. Survivors' preferences were influenced by their current health and families' financial burden and stress.
在长期机械通气的幸存者中,很少有人探讨过对这种治疗方式的偏好。
了解长期机械通气(≥7天)幸存者的偏好以及影响这些偏好的因素。
采用描述性横断面调查设计。研究对象从一家三级护理医院的重症监护病房和长期护理机构招募。每位研究对象(n = 30)被要求反思使用机械通气的决定;对当前健康状况、重症监护病房以及机械通气带来的疼痛/不适、感知到的家庭经济负担,以及与机械通气相关的情绪/身体压力进行评分;确定会影响对机械通气偏好的变化;并回答有关生活质量、功能状态、抑郁症状和沟通的问题。
大多数研究对象(75.9%)会选择机械通气。选择机械通气的研究对象的机械通气和气管切开术的中位天数更多(分别为98.5天对70天),气管切开术的中位天数也是如此(102天对64天)。未选择机械通气的患者有更多抑郁症状,且更有可能由医疗保险承保。两组之间的其他变量没有差异。倾向于选择机械通气的患者会基于其家庭的情绪/身体压力和经济负担而改变其偏好。不倾向于选择机械通气的患者如果家庭经济负担和情绪/身体压力减轻且当前健康状况改善,会改变其偏好。
大多数患者会选择机械通气。幸存者的偏好受其当前健康状况以及家庭经济负担和压力的影响。