Rigby Patricia, Ryan Stephen, Joos Shone, Cooper Barbara, Jutai Jeffrey W, Steggles Iielizabeth
Bloorview Research Institute, Bloorview MacMillan Children's Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Assist Technol. 2005 Fall;17(2):89-97. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2005.10132099.
Structured interviews were used to evaluate the impact of electronic aids to daily living (EADL) on functional abilities and psychosocial well-being. The participants included 32 adults (26 men, 6 women; mean age of 39 years) with cervical spinal cord injuries. The experiences of 16 EADL users were compared with a control group of 16 nonusers, using the Functional Autonomy Measuring Scale, the Lincoln Outcome Measures for Environmental Controls, and the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale. Results show EADL users had significantly better performance (p < .05) than nonusers for instrumental activities of daily living and for 75% of 12 daily tasks. Many non-users had hands-free control of phones only, whereas EADL users had control over many other household devices, which optimized their independence. The psychosocial impact of this technology was very positive for competence, adaptability, and self-esteem. In conclusion, functional abilities were greater for a variety of daily tasks, and psychosocial impact was positive when EADLs were used.
采用结构化访谈来评估日常生活电子辅助器具(EADL)对功能能力和心理社会幸福感的影响。参与者包括32名患有颈脊髓损伤的成年人(26名男性,6名女性;平均年龄39岁)。使用功能自主测量量表、林肯环境控制结果测量量表和辅助设备的心理社会影响量表,将16名EADL使用者的体验与16名非使用者的对照组进行比较。结果显示,在日常生活工具性活动和12项日常任务中的75%方面,EADL使用者的表现显著优于非使用者(p < .05)。许多非使用者仅能免提控制手机,而EADL使用者能够控制许多其他家用设备,这优化了他们的独立性。这项技术对能力、适应能力和自尊的心理社会影响非常积极。总之,使用EADL时,在各种日常任务中功能能力更强,心理社会影响是积极的。