Suppr超能文献

儿童电动轮椅:全国供应商调查结果

Pediatric powered wheelchairs: results of a national survey of providers.

作者信息

Guerette Paula, Tefft Donita, Furumasu Jan

机构信息

Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Technology for Children With Orthopedic Disabilities, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, California, USA.

出版信息

Assist Technol. 2005 Fall;17(2):144-58. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2005.10132104.

Abstract

A national survey of providers of pediatric powered wheelchairs was conducted to collect background data on these professionals and to develop a "model" of their current assessment and recommendation practices. Data collected in the survey included provider demographics, frequency of powered wheelchair provision to young children, common reasons for not recommending a powered wheelchair, reasons why a child who is recommended a powered wheelchair does not receive one, current pediatric powered wheelchair assessment and recommendation practices, and subjective data regarding the efficacy of these practices and the impact of powered wheelchairs on children. Respondents rated the frequency with which they performed various wheelchair assessment and recommendation practices, and these ratings were analyzed to determine activities that were performed frequently. These activities were then combined into common "factors" using factor analysis, and the results of the factor analysis were used to create a model of current pediatric powered wheelchair assessment and recommendation practices. A total of 140 surveys were received from providers in 46 states. Of these providers, 54% were clinicians (e.g., physical therapists, occupational therapists), and 46% were suppliers (e.g., Rehabilitation Technology Specialists), representing a variety of geographic locations and facility types. The 3 major reasons for not recommending a powered wheelchair included cognitive, physical, and behavioral factors. The 3 major reasons why a child who is recommended a powered wheelchair does not receive one included funding issues, lack of family support, and transportation issues. The model of current pediatric powered wheelchair provision includes 4 assessment factors: Preliminary Clinical Assessment, Intake, Advanced Clinical Assessment, and Consideration of Other Factors. Typical recommendations include both therapeutic and nonclinical interventions. A modified version of this model, which addresses some issues identified in the survey that limit wheelchair recommendations, is currently being tested at 4 clinical sites.

摘要

针对儿科电动轮椅供应商开展了一项全国性调查,以收集这些专业人员的背景数据,并构建他们当前评估与推荐做法的“模型”。调查收集的数据包括供应商的人口统计学信息、向幼儿提供电动轮椅的频率、不推荐电动轮椅的常见原因、被推荐使用电动轮椅的儿童却未获得轮椅的原因、当前儿科电动轮椅的评估与推荐做法,以及关于这些做法的效果和电动轮椅对儿童影响的主观数据。受访者对他们开展各种轮椅评估和推荐做法的频率进行了评分,并对这些评分进行分析以确定经常开展的活动。然后使用因子分析将这些活动合并为常见的“因子”,因子分析的结果用于创建当前儿科电动轮椅评估和推荐做法的模型。共收到来自46个州供应商的140份调查问卷。在这些供应商中,54%是临床医生(如物理治疗师、职业治疗师),46%是供应商(如康复技术专家),他们来自不同的地理位置和机构类型。不推荐电动轮椅的3个主要原因包括认知、身体和行为因素。被推荐使用电动轮椅的儿童却未获得轮椅的3个主要原因包括资金问题、缺乏家庭支持和交通问题。当前儿科电动轮椅供应模型包括4个评估因子:初步临床评估、接诊、高级临床评估和其他因素考量。典型的推荐包括治疗性和非临床干预措施。该模型的一个修改版本正在4个临床地点进行测试,该版本解决了调查中发现的一些限制轮椅推荐的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验