Vevea Jack L, Woods Carol M
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Psychol Methods. 2005 Dec;10(4):428-43. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.428.
Publication bias, sometimes known as the "file-drawer problem" or "funnel-plot asymmetry," is common in empirical research. The authors review the implications of publication bias for quantitative research synthesis (meta-analysis) and describe existing techniques for detecting and correcting it. A new approach is proposed that is suitable for application to meta-analytic data sets that are too small for the application of existing methods. The model estimates parameters relevant to fixed-effects, mixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis contingent on a hypothetical pattern of bias that is fixed independently of the data. The authors illustrate this approach for sensitivity analysis using 3 data sets adapted from a commonly cited reference work on research synthesis (H. M. Cooper & L. V. Hedges, 1994).
发表偏倚,有时也被称为“抽屉问题”或“漏斗图不对称性”,在实证研究中很常见。作者回顾了发表偏倚对定量研究综合(荟萃分析)的影响,并描述了现有的检测和纠正方法。提出了一种新方法,适用于对现有方法来说规模过小的荟萃分析数据集。该模型根据独立于数据确定的假设偏倚模式,估计与固定效应、混合效应或随机效应荟萃分析相关的参数。作者使用从一本关于研究综合的常被引用的参考文献(H. M. 库珀和L. V. 赫奇斯,1994年)改编的3个数据集,说明了这种敏感性分析方法。