Pandolfino J E, Ghosh S, Zhang Q, Heath M, Bombeck T, Kahrilas P J
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan 15;23(2):331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02750.x.
Ambulatory pH monitoring is considered the gold standard for measuring oesophageal acid exposure, however, data comparing antimony and glass electrodes are limited.
To compare the accuracy of the Slimline antimony pH monitoring system and a conventional glass electrode catheter pH monitoring system during ambulatory conditions.
Eighteen subjects (13 males, 23-45 years) underwent simultaneous pH monitoring using the Slimline antimony pH electrode and MIC M3 glass pH electrode pH monitoring systems for 12 h. Acid exposure was analysed and compared by manual extraction of the data onto an excel spreadsheet.
There was no statistical difference in the median per cent time the pH was <4 recorded by the two systems (Slimline, 3%, Glass MIC M3, 2%, P = 0.77) and the correlation was excellent (r = 0.84). The difference in recorded reflux events was also not significantly different between the two systems, with the absolute difference being 23 events (s.d., 26). Point-by-point discrepancy was 28% (s.d., 18%), however, the agreement in terms of reflex events was excellent (Kappa value, 0.89, s.d., 0.09).
Despite substantial point-by-point disagreement, the antimony Slimline pH catheter compares favourably to the Glass MIC M3 pH catheter in terms of measuring standard pH parameters.
动态pH监测被认为是测量食管酸暴露的金标准,然而,比较锑电极和玻璃电极的相关数据有限。
比较动态条件下Slimline锑pH监测系统与传统玻璃电极导管pH监测系统的准确性。
18名受试者(13名男性,年龄23 - 45岁)使用Slimline锑pH电极和MIC M3玻璃pH电极pH监测系统同时进行12小时的pH监测。通过将数据手动提取到Excel电子表格中对酸暴露情况进行分析和比较。
两个系统记录的pH值<4的中位时间百分比无统计学差异(Slimline为3%,Glass MIC M3为2%,P = 0.77),且相关性良好(r = 0.84)。两个系统记录的反流事件差异也无统计学意义,绝对差异为23次事件(标准差为26)。逐点差异为28%(标准差为18%),然而,在反流事件方面的一致性良好(Kappa值为0.89,标准差为0.09)。
尽管存在较大的逐点差异,但在测量标准pH参数方面,锑制Slimline pH导管与Glass MIC M3 pH导管相比具有优势。