入院时的阿片类药物成瘾者与缓释口服吗啡、美沙酮及舌下含服丁丙诺啡维持治疗参与者。
Opioid addicts at admission vs. slow-release oral morphine, methadone, and sublingual buprenorphine maintenance treatment participants.
作者信息
Giacomuzzi S, Kemmler G, Ertl M, Riemer Y
机构信息
University Department of Psychiatry, Innsbruck, Austria.
出版信息
Subst Use Misuse. 2006;41(2):223-44. doi: 10.1080/10826080500391845.
With use of a randomized study design, quality of life (QOL) and physical symptoms of opioid addicts at admission were compared with slow-release oral morphine, methadone, and sublingual buprenorphine maintenance program participants after 6 months of treatment. The study was conducted from February to July 2004 in the outpatient drug user treatment center at University Department of Psychiatry at Innsbruck, providing maintenance treatment programs and detoxification in Tyrol, Austria. One hundred twenty opioid users seeking treatment were compared with 120 opioid-dependent patients retained for 6 months on a slow-release oral morphine, methadone, or sublingual buprenorphine maintenance program. The German version ("Berlin Quality of Life Profile") of the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile was used, and illicit opioid use was determined by urinalysis. Physical symptoms were measured by using the Opioid Withdrawal Scale. Urinalyses revealed a significantly lower consumption of cocaine and opioids in all three substitution groups than in patients at admission (p < 0.001 and p < or = 0.004, respectively). Both the buprenorphine and the methadone maintenance group showed significantly more favorable values than opioid clients at admission for stomach cramps (p < or = 0.002), muscular tension (p < or = 0.027), general pain (p < or = 0.001), feelings of coldness (p < or = 0.000), heart pounding (p < or = 0.008), runny eyes (p < or = 0.047), and aggressions (p < or = 0.009). Patients who received slow-release oral morphine treatment generally showed the least favorable QOL scores compared with patients at admission or sublingual buprenorphine and methadone clients. Patients in the sublingual buprenorphine or methadone program showed nearly the same QOL scores. The buprenorphine and the methadone maintenance group showed significantly more favorable values than opioid clients at admission regarding leisure time (p < or = 0.019), finances (p < or = 0.014), mental health (p < or = 0.010), and overall satisfaction (p < or = 0.010). Slow-release oral morphine is a well-established treatment for pain, but more research is required to evaluate it as a treatment for heroin dependence. The present data indicate that slow-release oral morphine could have some disadvantages compared with sublingual buprenorphine and methadone in QOL, physical symptoms, and additional consumption. The results further suggest that buprenorphine treatment is as effective as methadone in effects on quality of life and physical symptoms.
采用随机研究设计,将阿片类成瘾者入院时的生活质量(QOL)和身体症状与接受6个月治疗后的缓释口服吗啡、美沙酮及舌下丁丙诺啡维持治疗项目参与者进行比较。该研究于2004年2月至7月在奥地利因斯布鲁克大学精神病学系门诊药物使用者治疗中心开展,该中心在蒂罗尔提供维持治疗项目和戒毒治疗。将120名寻求治疗的阿片类使用者与120名在缓释口服吗啡、美沙酮或舌下丁丙诺啡维持治疗项目上持续治疗6个月的阿片类依赖患者进行比较。使用了兰开夏生活质量量表的德文版(“柏林生活质量量表”),并通过尿液分析确定非法阿片类药物的使用情况。使用阿片类戒断量表测量身体症状。尿液分析显示,所有三个替代治疗组的可卡因和阿片类药物消耗量均显著低于入院患者(分别为p < 0.001和p ≤ 0.004)。丁丙诺啡和美沙酮维持治疗组在胃痉挛(p ≤ 0.002)、肌肉紧张(p ≤ 0.027)、全身疼痛(p ≤ 0.001)、发冷感(p ≤ 0.000)、心跳过速(p ≤ 0.008)、流泪(p ≤ 0.047)和攻击性(p ≤ 0.009)方面的数值均显著优于入院时的阿片类使用者。与入院患者或舌下丁丙诺啡和美沙酮使用者相比,接受缓释口服吗啡治疗的患者总体生活质量评分通常最不理想。舌下丁丙诺啡或美沙酮项目的患者生活质量评分几乎相同。丁丙诺啡和美沙酮维持治疗组在休闲时间(p ≤ 0.019)、财务状况(p ≤ 0.014)、心理健康(p ≤ 0.010)和总体满意度(p ≤ 0.010)方面的数值均显著优于入院时的阿片类使用者。缓释口服吗啡是一种成熟的疼痛治疗方法,但作为海洛因依赖的治疗方法,还需要更多研究来评估。目前的数据表明,在生活质量、身体症状和额外药物消耗量方面,缓释口服吗啡与舌下丁丙诺啡和美沙酮相比可能存在一些劣势。结果还进一步表明,丁丙诺啡治疗在对生活质量和身体症状的影响方面与美沙酮一样有效。