Vezina Heather E, Henry Keith, Ravindran G D, Kurpad Anura V, Raj Tony D S, Fox Kathy, Weller Dennis, Brundage Richard C, Cavert Winston, Balfour Henry H
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Feb 1;41(2):131-6. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000199098.95967.ab.
Low-cost generic antiretroviral drugs are available in resource-limited settings for treatment of HIV infections. However, few bioequivalence data in specific populations in which these generics are likely to be used are available. We conducted a randomized crossover bioequivalence study of generic and brand name formulations of nevirapine, zidovudine, and lamivudine in HIV-negative Indian women using US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria. Subjects took single doses of all formulations separated by a 14-day washout period. Plasma concentrations were measured over 96 hours during each study period. Average bioequivalence was determined using natural log-transformed maximum concentration (C(max)) and area-under-the-concentration-time curve (AUC) mean ratio data. Fifteen Indian women were enrolled. The 90% confidence intervals for nevirapine (14 subjects) and lamivudine (15 subjects) C(max), AUC from 0 to the last measurable time point (AUC(0-t)), and AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) mean ratios and zidovudine (15 subjects) AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity) mean ratios were all within 0.80 to 1.25. However, the 90% confidence interval for zidovudine C(max) mean ratio was 0.70 to 1.46. Generic and brand name nevirapine and lamivudine met FDA average bioequivalence criteria. Lack of average bioequivalence for zidovudine was found for C(max) but is not expected to be clinically significant, because the total AUC values were similar between formulations.
在资源有限的环境中可获得低成本的抗逆转录病毒仿制药,用于治疗艾滋病毒感染。然而,在可能使用这些仿制药的特定人群中,几乎没有生物等效性数据。我们使用美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的标准,对艾滋病毒阴性的印度女性进行了一项随机交叉生物等效性研究,比较奈韦拉平、齐多夫定和拉米夫定的仿制药和品牌药制剂。受试者服用所有制剂的单剂量,间隔14天的洗脱期。在每个研究期间测量96小时内的血浆浓度。使用自然对数转换后的最大浓度(C(max))和浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)平均比值数据确定平均生物等效性。招募了15名印度女性。奈韦拉平(14名受试者)和拉米夫定(15名受试者)的C(max)、从0到最后可测量时间点的AUC(AUC(0-t))以及从0到无穷大的AUC(AUC(0-infinity))平均比值,以及齐多夫定(15名受试者)的AUC(0-t)和AUC(0-infinity)平均比值的90%置信区间均在0.80至1.25之间。然而,齐多夫定C(max)平均比值的90%置信区间为0.70至1.46。仿制药和品牌药奈韦拉平和拉米夫定符合FDA平均生物等效性标准。发现齐多夫定的C(max)缺乏平均生物等效性,但预计在临床上不具有显著意义,因为各制剂之间的总AUC值相似。