Dyson Benjamin J, Alain Claude, He Yu
Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, England.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Sep;5(3):319-38. doi: 10.3758/cabn.5.3.319.
The sharing of processing resources between the senses was investigated by examining the effects of visual task load on auditory event-related brain potentials (ERPs). In Experiment 1, participants completed both a zero-back and a one-back visual task while a tone pattern or a harmonic series was presented. N1 and P2 waves were modulated by visual task difficulty, but neither mismatch negativity (MMN) elicited by deviant stimuli from the tone pattern nor object-related negativity (ORN) elicited by mistuning from the harmonic series was affected. In Experiment 2, participants responded to identity (what) or location (where) in vision, while ignoring sounds alternating in either pitch (what) or location (where). Auditory ERP modulations were consistent with task difficulty, rather than with task specificity. In Experiment 3, we investigated auditory ERP generation under conditions of no visual task. The results are discussed with respect to a distinction between process-general (N1 and P2) and process-specific (MMN and ORN) auditory ERPs.
通过检查视觉任务负荷对听觉事件相关脑电位(ERP)的影响,研究了不同感官之间处理资源的共享情况。在实验1中,参与者在呈现音调模式或和声序列的同时,完成了零回溯和一回溯视觉任务。N1和P2波受视觉任务难度调制,但音调模式中偏差刺激引发的失匹配负波(MMN)以及和声序列中失谐引发的客体相关负波(ORN)均未受影响。在实验2中,参与者对视觉中的身份(是什么)或位置(在哪里)做出反应,同时忽略音高(是什么)或位置(在哪里)交替变化的声音。听觉ERP调制与任务难度一致,而非与任务特异性一致。在实验3中,我们研究了无视觉任务条件下听觉ERP的产生。结合过程通用(N1和P2)和过程特定(MMN和ORN)听觉ERP之间的区别对结果进行了讨论。