Wiens Stefan, van Berlekom Erik, Szychowska Malina, Eklund Rasmus
Gösta Ekmans Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 27;10:1970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01970. eCollection 2019.
The mismatch negativity (MMN) has been of particular interest in auditory perception because of its sensitivity to auditory change. It is typically measured in an oddball task and is computed as the difference of deviant minus standard tones. Previous studies suggest that the oddball MMN can be reduced by crossmodal attention to a concurrent, difficult visual task. However, more recent studies did not replicate this effect. Because previous findings seem to be biased, we preregistered the present study and used Bayesian hypothesis testing to measure the strength of evidence for or against an effect of visual task difficulty. We manipulated visual perceptual load (high and low load). In the task, the visual stimuli were identical for both loads to avoid confounding effects from physical differences of the visual stimuli. We also measured the corrected MMN because the oddball MMN may be confounded by physical differences between deviant and standard tones. The corrected MMN is obtained with a separate control condition in which the same tone as the deviant (critical tone) is equiprobable with other tones. The corrected MMN is computed as deviant minus critical tones. Furthermore, we assessed working memory capacity to examine its moderating role. In our large sample ( = 49), the evidential strength in support of no effect of visual load was moderate for the oddball MMN (9.09 > BF01 > 3.57) and anecdotal to moderate for the corrected MMN (4.55 > BF01 > 2.17). Also, working memory capacity did not correlate with the visual load effect on the oddball MMN and the corrected MMN. The present findings support the robustness of the auditory frequency MMN to manipulations of crossmodal, visual attention and suggest that this relationship is not moderated by working memory capacity.
失配负波(MMN)因其对听觉变化的敏感性而在听觉感知中备受关注。它通常在oddball任务中进行测量,并计算为偏差音调减去标准音调的差值。先前的研究表明,通过对同时进行的困难视觉任务进行跨模态注意,可以降低oddball MMN。然而,最近的研究并未重复这一效应。由于先前的研究结果似乎存在偏差,我们预先注册了本研究,并使用贝叶斯假设检验来衡量支持或反对视觉任务难度效应的证据强度。我们操纵了视觉感知负荷(高负荷和低负荷)。在任务中,两种负荷的视觉刺激相同,以避免视觉刺激物理差异带来的混淆效应。我们还测量了校正后的MMN,因为oddball MMN可能会因偏差音调和标准音调之间的物理差异而产生混淆。校正后的MMN是在一个单独的控制条件下获得的,在该条件下,与偏差音(关键音)相同的音调与其他音调具有同等可能性。校正后的MMN计算为偏差音调减去关键音调。此外,我们评估了工作记忆容量,以检验其调节作用。在我们的大样本(n = 49)中,支持视觉负荷无效应的证据强度对于oddball MMN为中等(9.09 > BF01 > 3.57),对于校正后的MMN为轶事性到中等(4.55 > BF01 > 2.17)。此外,工作记忆容量与视觉负荷对oddball MMN和校正后的MMN的效应无关。本研究结果支持听觉频率MMN对跨模态视觉注意操纵的稳健性,并表明这种关系不受工作记忆容量的调节。