Suppr超能文献

心理学家的处方权:对当前问题与争议的全面回顾及批判性分析

Prescription privileges for psychologists: a comprehensive review and critical analysis of current issues and controversies.

作者信息

Lavoie Kim L, Barone Silvana

机构信息

Division of Chest Medicine, Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

CNS Drugs. 2006;20(1):51-66. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200620010-00005.

Abstract

The debate over whether clinical psychologists should be granted the right to prescribe psychoactive medications has received considerable attention over the past 2 decades in North America and, more recently, in the UK. Proponents of granting prescription privileges to clinical psychologists argue that mental healthcare services are in crisis and that the mental health needs of society are not being met. They attribute this crisis primarily to the inappropriate prescribing practices of general practitioners and a persistent shortage of psychiatrists. It is believed that, as they would increase the scope of the practice of psychology, prescription privileges for psychologists would enhance mental health services by increasing public access to qualified professionals who are able to prescribe. The profession of psychology remains divided on the issue, and opponents have been equally outspoken in their arguments. The purpose of the present article is to place the pursuit of prescription privileges for psychologists in context by discussing the historical antecedents and major forces driving the debate. The major arguments put forth for and against prescription privileges for psychologists are presented, followed by a critical analysis of the validity and coherence of those arguments. Through this analysis, the following question is addressed. Is there currently sufficient empirical support for the desirability, feasibility, safety and cost effectiveness of granting prescription privileges to psychologists? Although proponents of granting prescription privileges to psychologists present several compelling arguments in favour of this practice, there remains a consistent lack of empirical evidence for the desirability, feasibility, safety and cost effectiveness of this proposal. More research is needed before we can conclude that prescription privileges for psychologists are a safe and logical solution to the problems facing the mental healthcare system.

摘要

在过去20年里,关于临床心理学家是否应被赋予开具精神活性药物处方的权利这一争论在北美受到了相当多的关注,最近在英国也是如此。支持赋予临床心理学家处方权的人认为,精神卫生保健服务正处于危机之中,社会的心理健康需求未得到满足。他们将这场危机主要归因于全科医生不适当的处方行为以及精神科医生的持续短缺。人们认为,赋予心理学家处方权将扩大心理学的执业范围,从而通过增加公众获得有资格开具处方专业人员的机会来加强心理健康服务。心理学界在这个问题上仍然存在分歧,反对者在他们的论点中同样直言不讳。本文的目的是通过讨论推动这场争论的历史先例和主要力量,将对心理学家处方权的追求置于背景之中。文中呈现了支持和反对心理学家处方权的主要论点,随后对这些论点的有效性和连贯性进行了批判性分析。通过这一分析解决了以下问题。目前是否有足够的实证支持赋予心理学家处方权的可取性、可行性、安全性和成本效益?尽管支持赋予心理学家处方权的人提出了几个令人信服的支持这一做法的论点,但对于这一提议的可取性、可行性、安全性和成本效益仍然一直缺乏实证证据。在我们能够得出结论认为赋予心理学家处方权是解决精神卫生保健系统所面临问题的安全且合理的办法之前,还需要更多的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验