Guzzella L, Capri E, Di Corcia A, Barra Caracciolo A, Giuliano G
Istituto di Ricerca sulle Acque--CNR, via Della Mornera 25, 20047 Brugherio (MI), Italy.
J Environ Qual. 2006 Jan 5;35(1):312-23. doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.0025. Print 2006 Jan-Feb.
The environmental fate of herbicides can be studied at different levels: in the lab with disturbed or undisturbed soil columns or in the field with suction cup lysimeters or soil enclosure lysimeters. A field lysimeter experiment with 10 soil enclosures was performed to evaluate the mass balance in different environmental compartments of the phenylurea herbicides diuron [3-(3,4-diclorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl-urea] and linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea]. After application on the agricultural soil, the herbicides were searched for in soil, pore water, and air samples. Soil and water samples were collected at different depths of the soil profile and analyzed to determine residual concentrations of both the parent compounds and of their main transformation products, to verify their persistence and their leaching capacity. Air volatilization was calculated using the theoretical profile shape method. The herbicides were detected only in the surface layer (0-10 cm) of soil. In this layer, diuron was reduced to 50% of its initial concentration at the end of the experiment, while linuron was still 70% present after 245 d. The main metabolites detected were DCPMU [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methylurea] and DCA (3,4-dichloroaniline). In soil pore water, diuron and linuron were detected at depths of 20 and 40 cm, although in very low concentrations. Therefore the leaching of these herbicides was quite low in this experiment. Moreover, volatilization losses were inconsequential. The calculated total mass balance showed a high persistence of linuron and diuron in the soil, a low mobility in soil pore water (less than 0.5% in leachate water), and a negligible volatilization effect. The application of the Pesticide Leaching Model (PELMO) showed similar low mobility of the chemicals in soil and water, but overestimated their volatilization and their degradation to the metabolite DCPMU. In conclusion, the use of soil enclosure lysimeters proved to be a good experimental design for studying mobility and transport processes of herbicides in field conditions.
在实验室中使用扰动或未扰动的土柱,或者在田间使用吸盘式蒸渗仪或土壤围隔蒸渗仪。进行了一项在10个土壤围隔中的田间蒸渗仪实验,以评估苯基脲类除草剂敌草隆[3-(3,4-二氯苯基)-1,1-二甲基脲]和利谷隆[3-(3,4-二氯苯基)-1-甲氧基-1-甲基脲]在不同环境隔室中的质量平衡。在农业土壤上施用除草剂后,在土壤、孔隙水和空气样本中寻找这些除草剂。在土壤剖面的不同深度采集土壤和水样,并进行分析以确定母体化合物及其主要转化产物的残留浓度,以验证它们的持久性及其淋溶能力。使用理论剖面形状法计算空气挥发量。除草剂仅在土壤表层(0 - 10厘米)被检测到。在该层中,实验结束时敌草隆浓度降至初始浓度的50%,而利谷隆在245天后仍有70%存在。检测到的主要代谢物是DCPMU[3-(3,4-二氯苯基)-1-甲基脲]和DCA(3,4-二氯苯胺)。在土壤孔隙水中,在20厘米和40厘米深度检测到了敌草隆和利谷隆,尽管浓度非常低。因此,在该实验中这些除草剂的淋溶程度相当低。此外,挥发损失微不足道。计算得出的总质量平衡表明,利谷隆和敌草隆在土壤中具有很高的持久性,在土壤孔隙水中迁移性较低(渗滤液中低于0.5%),且挥发效应可忽略不计。农药淋溶模型(PELMO)的应用表明这些化学物质在土壤和水中的迁移性同样较低,但高估了它们的挥发以及它们向代谢物DCPMU的降解。总之,事实证明使用土壤围隔蒸渗仪是研究田间条件下除草剂迁移性和传输过程的良好实验设计。