Raife Thomas J, Friedman Kenneth D, Dwyre Denis M
Department of Pathology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
Transfusion. 2006 Jan;46(1):74-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00674.x.
New developments in the understanding of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) provide opportunities for improved patient care. A widely held historical model of TTP microvascular thrombosis implicated circulating ultra large von Willebrand factor (ULVWF) in causing spontaneous platelet (PLT) aggregation. From this pathogenic model, concerns about ULVWF in fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) used to treat patients led to widespread use of cryopoor plasma (CPP) as an alternative. There is scant evidence, however, that circulating ULVWF contributes to microvascular thrombosis in TTP. New evidence suggests that the formation of PLT aggregates in TTP may be mediated by VWF in the process of being released from endothelium. Moreover, clinical studies do not demonstrate superior efficacy of CPP compared to FFP in the treatment of TTP. Because CPP may have reduced concentrations of factors important in the treatment of TTP, including ADAMTS13 metalloprotease, a reappraisal of the use of CPP in the treatment of TTP is warranted.
对血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(TTP)认识的新进展为改善患者护理提供了机会。一个被广泛接受的TTP微血管血栓形成的历史模型认为,循环中的超大血管性血友病因子(ULVWF)会导致自发性血小板(PLT)聚集。基于这个致病模型,人们担心用于治疗患者的新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)中的ULVWF,这导致冷沉淀贫血浆(CPP)作为替代品被广泛使用。然而,几乎没有证据表明循环中的ULVWF会导致TTP中的微血管血栓形成。新证据表明,TTP中PLT聚集体的形成可能是由从内皮细胞释放过程中的VWF介导的。此外,临床研究并未证明CPP在治疗TTP方面比FFP具有更高的疗效。由于CPP中可能含有治疗TTP重要的因子浓度降低,包括ADAMTS13金属蛋白酶,因此有必要重新评估CPP在TTP治疗中的应用。