Kitaoka Harold B, Crevoisier Xavier M, Harbst Kimberly, Hansen Diana, Kotajarvi Brian, Kaufman Kenton
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.120.
To assess the effects on gait of custom-made polypropylene orthoses: ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), rigid hindfoot orthosis (HFO-R), and articulated hindfoot orthosis (HFO-A).
Experimental assessment.
Institutional practice, motion analysis laboratory.
Twenty asymptomatic normative subjects.
Not applicable.
Three-dimensional kinematics, ground reaction force, and time-related factors in 4 conditions: shoe only, and shod with the AFO, HFO-R, and HFO-A.
The AFO and HFO-R limited sagittal and coronal plane ankle-hindfoot motion. The HFO-A limited hindfoot coronal motion while allowing normal sagittal motion. At the midfoot, the AFO and HFO-A limited transverse motion, but the HFO-A also limited sagittal and coronal motion. Use of the HFO-R resulted in exaggerated midfoot sagittal and coronal motion. Braces that limited motion to a greater degree were associated with more atypical kinetic variables, indicative of less dynamic gait. The HFO-A resulted in ground reaction forces most similar to unbraced conditions.
Alteration in gait was affected by orthosis design. Orthoses with a rigid component crossing a joint restricted motion at that joint, but potentially compromised typical gait kinetic factors. For immobilizing the hindfoot, the HFO-A may be more comfortable and still provide more stability than the HFO-R or AFO.
评估定制聚丙烯矫形器对步态的影响,包括踝足矫形器(AFO)、刚性后足矫形器(HFO-R)和关节式后足矫形器(HFO-A)。
实验评估。
机构实践,运动分析实验室。
20名无症状的正常受试者。
不适用。
在4种情况下的三维运动学、地面反作用力和与时间相关的因素,这4种情况分别为:仅穿鞋子,以及穿着AFO、HFO-R和HFO-A矫形器。
AFO和HFO-R限制了矢状面和冠状面的踝后足运动。HFO-A限制了后足冠状面运动,同时允许正常的矢状面运动。在中足,AFO和HFO-A限制了横向运动,但HFO-A也限制了矢状面和冠状面运动。使用HFO-R导致中足矢状面和冠状面运动过度。在更大程度上限制运动的矫形器与更多非典型动力学变量相关,表明步态动态性较差。HFO-A产生的地面反作用力与未佩戴矫形器的情况最为相似。
步态改变受矫形器设计的影响。带有刚性部件跨过关节的矫形器会限制该关节的运动,但可能会损害典型的步态动力学因素。对于固定后足,HFO-A可能更舒适,并且比HFO-R或AFO仍能提供更多稳定性。