Suppr超能文献

定制的踝关节和后足支具对踝关节和足部运动学及地面反作用力的影响。

The effect of custom-made braces for the ankle and hindfoot on ankle and foot kinematics and ground reaction forces.

作者信息

Kitaoka Harold B, Crevoisier Xavier M, Harbst Kimberly, Hansen Diana, Kotajarvi Brian, Kaufman Kenton

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.120.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects on gait of custom-made polypropylene orthoses: ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), rigid hindfoot orthosis (HFO-R), and articulated hindfoot orthosis (HFO-A).

DESIGN

Experimental assessment.

SETTING

Institutional practice, motion analysis laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty asymptomatic normative subjects.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Three-dimensional kinematics, ground reaction force, and time-related factors in 4 conditions: shoe only, and shod with the AFO, HFO-R, and HFO-A.

RESULTS

The AFO and HFO-R limited sagittal and coronal plane ankle-hindfoot motion. The HFO-A limited hindfoot coronal motion while allowing normal sagittal motion. At the midfoot, the AFO and HFO-A limited transverse motion, but the HFO-A also limited sagittal and coronal motion. Use of the HFO-R resulted in exaggerated midfoot sagittal and coronal motion. Braces that limited motion to a greater degree were associated with more atypical kinetic variables, indicative of less dynamic gait. The HFO-A resulted in ground reaction forces most similar to unbraced conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Alteration in gait was affected by orthosis design. Orthoses with a rigid component crossing a joint restricted motion at that joint, but potentially compromised typical gait kinetic factors. For immobilizing the hindfoot, the HFO-A may be more comfortable and still provide more stability than the HFO-R or AFO.

摘要

目的

评估定制聚丙烯矫形器对步态的影响,包括踝足矫形器(AFO)、刚性后足矫形器(HFO-R)和关节式后足矫形器(HFO-A)。

设计

实验评估。

地点

机构实践,运动分析实验室。

参与者

20名无症状的正常受试者。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

在4种情况下的三维运动学、地面反作用力和与时间相关的因素,这4种情况分别为:仅穿鞋子,以及穿着AFO、HFO-R和HFO-A矫形器。

结果

AFO和HFO-R限制了矢状面和冠状面的踝后足运动。HFO-A限制了后足冠状面运动,同时允许正常的矢状面运动。在中足,AFO和HFO-A限制了横向运动,但HFO-A也限制了矢状面和冠状面运动。使用HFO-R导致中足矢状面和冠状面运动过度。在更大程度上限制运动的矫形器与更多非典型动力学变量相关,表明步态动态性较差。HFO-A产生的地面反作用力与未佩戴矫形器的情况最为相似。

结论

步态改变受矫形器设计的影响。带有刚性部件跨过关节的矫形器会限制该关节的运动,但可能会损害典型的步态动力学因素。对于固定后足,HFO-A可能更舒适,并且比HFO-R或AFO仍能提供更多稳定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验