Matsui Teruo, Nakaaki Shutaro, Murata Yoshie, Sato Junko, Shinagawa Yoshihiro, Tatsumi Hiroshi, Furukawa Toshiaki A
Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;21(3):182-91. doi: 10.1159/000090744. Epub 2006 Jan 9.
Although QOL is an important indicator to assess multiple facets of life, the QOL of Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects with impaired cognitive ability due to dementia has not yet been fully investigated. In this study, we developed the Japanese version of the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's disease (QOL-AD) scale by means of back-translation, and ascertained its reliability and validity for evaluating the quality of life in AD subjects. We also hypothesized that the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms may determine the characteristics and determinants of both the patients' and the caregivers' responses to the patients' QOL questionnaire.
We administered the QOL-AD questionnaire to subjects with mild or moderate AD (n = 140). The test-retest reliability was evaluated by the same interviewer after a month's interval. Data from the following tests were also collected to ascertain the validity of the questionnaire: Short Memory Questionnaire (SMQ), Neuropsychiatry Inventory (NPI), Hyogo Activities of Daily Living Scale (HADL) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
The Japanese version of the QOL-AD questionnaire demonstrated good internal reliability for both the patients' (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) and the caregivers' responses (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82) and good test-retest reliability for both the patients' (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.84) and caregivers' reports (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91). The concordance between the patients' self-report and the caregivers' observation was moderate (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.60). The score for the 'mood factor' (apathy, depression/dysphoria) in NPI predicted the overall QOL score as determined from both the patients' and the caregivers' responses for subjects with mild (MMSE>or=21, n = 88) and moderate (MMSE< 21, n = 52) AD. The score for the 'psychosis factor' (delusions, hallucinations, anxiety, agitation, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor activity) in NPI predicted the total QOL score as determined by the patients and the caregivers among subjects with moderate AD only.
As hypothesized, the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms may be an important predictor of both the patients' and caregivers' responses to the patients' QOL questionnaire. QOL-AD appears to be a promising measure of the QOL of subjects with mild to moderate AD in Japan.
尽管生活质量是评估生活多个方面的重要指标,但因痴呆导致认知能力受损的阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的生活质量尚未得到充分研究。在本研究中,我们通过回译法开发了日语版的阿尔茨海默病生活质量(QOL-AD)量表,并确定了其在评估AD患者生活质量方面的信度和效度。我们还假设神经精神症状的存在可能决定患者及其照料者对患者生活质量问卷回答的特征和决定因素。
我们对轻度或中度AD患者(n = 140)进行了QOL-AD问卷调查。由同一名访谈者在间隔一个月后评估重测信度。还收集了以下测试的数据以确定问卷的效度:简短记忆问卷(SMQ)、神经精神科问卷(NPI)、兵库日常生活活动量表(HADL)和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)。
日语版的QOL-AD问卷在患者(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.84)和照料者回答(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.82)方面均显示出良好的内部信度,在患者(组内相关系数 = 0.84)和照料者报告(组内相关系数 = 0.91)方面均显示出良好的重测信度。患者自我报告与照料者观察之间的一致性为中等(皮尔逊相关系数 = 0.60)。NPI中“情绪因子”(淡漠、抑郁/烦躁)的得分预测了轻度(MMSE≥21,n = 88)和中度(MMSE<21,n = 52)AD患者的患者和照料者回答所确定的总体生活质量得分。NPI中“精神病因子”(妄想、幻觉、焦虑、激越、脱抑制、易怒、异常运动行为)的得分仅在中度AD患者中预测了患者和照料者所确定的总生活质量得分。
正如所假设的,神经精神症状的存在可能是患者及其照料者对患者生活质量问卷回答的重要预测指标。QOL-AD似乎是评估日本轻度至中度AD患者生活质量的一种有前景的方法。