• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[大隐静脉腔内射频消融与剥脱术的对比:一项初步研究]

[Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein versus stripping. A preliminary study].

作者信息

Colli R, Modugno P, Revelli L, Alberti V, Flore R, Santoliquido A, Tondi P

机构信息

Istituto di Semeiotica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma.

出版信息

Minerva Chir. 2005 Dec;60(6):481-6.

PMID:16402002
Abstract

AIM

To compare the postoperative courses of patients subjected to closure procedure or stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV).

METHODS

We examined 2 groups of 15 patients with ostial and truncular saphenous insufficiency matched for CEAP clinical and anatomic classes. Group A patients underwent saphenous closure; short stripping was performed on those of Group B. In the Group A surgery was performed under spinal (12) or local (3) anesthesia; the procedure was preceded by crossotomy (5), crossectomy (1) or saphenous ligation (8); in 11 cases micro-phlebotomies were associated. In the Group B surgery was performed under general (5), spinal (7) or local (3) anesthesia; the procedure always was preceded by crossectomy (1); in 11 cases micro-phlebotomies were associated.

RESULTS

Group A patients were discharged 6-18 hours after surgery. None presented ecchymosis, hyperemia or skin lesions. Five complained of mild aching thigh pain, which did not require pain medication. All resumed normal daily activities the day after surgery and returned to work after 4.9 days. Six months after surgery, none of the patients had evidence of saphenous vein re-channeling. Group B patients were discharged 12-18 hours after surgery. Nine had ecchymosis on the thigh. Five reported mild thigh pain requiring analgesics. Normal daily activities and work were resumed 2.7 and 9.3 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study seems to confirm that endoluminal radiofrequency ablation of the GSV provides good immediate results with no significant complications and can reduce postoperative pain and the length of convalescence with respect to those of stripping.

摘要

目的

比较大隐静脉(GSV)闭合术或剥脱术患者的术后病程。

方法

我们检查了两组各15例患有开口处和主干大隐静脉功能不全的患者,两组患者在CEAP临床和解剖学分级上相匹配。A组患者接受大隐静脉闭合术;B组患者进行短段剥脱术。A组手术在脊髓麻醉(12例)或局部麻醉(3例)下进行;手术前进行了交叉切开术(5例)、交叉切除术(1例)或大隐静脉结扎术(8例);11例患者同时进行了微静脉切除术。B组手术在全身麻醉(5例)、脊髓麻醉(7例)或局部麻醉(3例)下进行;手术前总是进行交叉切除术(1例);11例患者同时进行了微静脉切除术。

结果

A组患者术后6 - 18小时出院。无人出现瘀斑、充血或皮肤损伤。5例患者抱怨大腿有轻微疼痛,无需止痛药物。所有患者术后第二天恢复正常日常活动,4.9天后恢复工作。术后6个月,所有患者均无大隐静脉再通迹象。B组患者术后12 - 18小时出院。9例患者大腿出现瘀斑。5例患者报告大腿轻度疼痛,需要使用止痛药物。术后2.7天和9.3天恢复正常日常活动和工作。

结论

这项回顾性研究似乎证实,大隐静脉腔内射频消融术能提供良好的即时效果,无明显并发症,与剥脱术相比,可减轻术后疼痛并缩短康复时间。

相似文献

1
[Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein versus stripping. A preliminary study].[大隐静脉腔内射频消融与剥脱术的对比:一项初步研究]
Minerva Chir. 2005 Dec;60(6):481-6.
2
[Surgical techniques used for the treatment of varicose veins: survey of practice in France].[用于治疗静脉曲张的手术技术:法国的实践调查]
J Mal Vasc. 2003 Dec;28(5):277-86.
3
Traditional versus endoscopic saphenous vein stripping: a prospective randomized pilot trial.传统大隐静脉剥脱术与内镜下大隐静脉剥脱术:一项前瞻性随机试点试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Nov;36(5):611-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.025. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
4
Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency ablation or conventional high ligation and stripping for great saphenous varicose veins.射频消融与传统高位结扎剥脱术治疗大隐静脉曲张的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2010 Mar;97(3):328-36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6867.
5
[Indication for short stripping of the great saphenous vein. Results and indications].[大隐静脉短段剥脱术的适应证。结果与适应证]
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2001 Dec;49(6):383-7.
6
Radiofrequency ablation of the long saphenous vein without high ligation versus high ligation and stripping for primary varicose veins: pros and cons.大隐静脉射频消融不高位结扎与高位结扎剥脱术治疗原发性下肢静脉曲张的利弊
Semin Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar;15(1):34-8.
7
[A random, comparative study on endovenous laser therapy and saphenous veins stripping for the treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence].[一项关于静脉腔内激光治疗与大隐静脉剥脱术治疗大隐静脉功能不全的随机对照研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Nov 20;87(43):3043-6.
8
Radiofrequency ablation vs conventional surgery for varicose veins - a comparison of treatment costs in a randomised trial.射频消融与传统手术治疗静脉曲张的成本比较:一项随机试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;39(1):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.09.012. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
9
Conventional stripping versus cryostripping: a prospective randomised trial to compare improvement in quality of life and complications.传统剥脱术与冷冻剥脱术:一项比较生活质量改善情况和并发症的前瞻性随机试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Feb;35(2):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.08.017. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
10
Combined endovenous ablation and transilluminated powered phlebectomy: is less invasive better?静脉内消融联合透光动力静脉切除术:侵入性较小是否更好?
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2007 Feb-Mar;41(1):41-7. doi: 10.1177/1538574406296207.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of radiofrequency ablation for patients with varicose veins on the budget of the German statutory health insurance system.射频消融治疗静脉曲张对德国法定健康保险体系预算的影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2013 Apr 3;3(1):9. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-3-9.