Suppr超能文献

[家庭调查方法:以两项调查为例(塞内加尔班达法西的案例)]

[Methodology for household surveys: the case of two investigations carried out (example of Bandafassi, Senegal)].

作者信息

Guyavarch E, Chippaux J P

机构信息

Unité population et développement, INED, Paris, France.

出版信息

Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2005 Nov;98(4):269-72.

Abstract

The survey area of Bandafassi, in Eastern Senegal, was the subject of two studies each allowing to measure the risk of bite and death consecutive to a snakebite in a rural area. Two different methods were being used to carry out these investigations. Although both were based on the visit of households, the sample of the first study was designed to be representative of the population (the zone of study of Bandafassi is the subject of a regular demographic follow-up since 1970) while the second study was carried out by interviewing the concession (groups of households) heads. Therefore, the analysis of these surveys must take into account the sampling discrepancies. In spite of the different methodologies, similarities in the results obtained validate both methods and permitted to explain the small variations observed and to measure bias relative to this type of investigations.

摘要

位于塞内加尔东部的班达法西调查区域是两项研究的对象,每项研究都能测量农村地区蛇咬伤后的咬伤风险和死亡风险。开展这些调查使用了两种不同的方法。尽管两者都基于对家庭的走访,但第一项研究的样本旨在代表总体(自1970年以来,班达法西的研究区域一直是定期人口跟踪的对象),而第二项研究是通过采访特许权(家庭组)负责人进行的。因此,对这些调查的分析必须考虑到抽样差异。尽管方法不同,但所获结果的相似性验证了这两种方法,并有助于解释所观察到的细微差异,以及衡量相对于此类调查的偏差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验