• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者通过互联网获取健康信息:这如何影响医患关系。

Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship.

作者信息

McMullan Miriam

机构信息

University of Plymouth, Faculty of Health and Social Work, School of Health Professions, Peninsula Allied Health Centre, Derriford Road, Plymouth PL6 9BH, UK.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006. Epub 2006 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006
PMID:16406474
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Health information is one of the most frequently sought topics on the Internet. A review of the literature was carried out to determine the use of the Internet for health information by the patient and how this could affect the patient-health professional relationship.

METHODS

This study is a literature review, summarizing multiple empirical studies on a single subject and is not intended to be a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The review showed that the majority of health related Internet searches by patients are for specific medical conditions. They are carried out by the patient: (1) before the clinical encounter to seek information to manage their own healthcare independently and/or to decide whether they need professional help; (2) after the clinical encounter for reassurance or because of dissatisfaction with the amount of detailed information provided by the health professional during the encounter.

CONCLUSION

There has been a shift in the role of the patient from passive recipient to active consumer of health information. Health professionals are responding to the more 'Internet informed' patient in one or more of three ways: (1) the health professional feels threatened by the information the patient brings and responds defensively by asserting their 'expert opinion' (health professional-centred relationship). (2) The health professional and patient collaborate in obtaining and analysing the information (patient-centred relationship). (3) The health professional will guide patients to reliable health information websites (Internet prescription).

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

It is important that health professionals acknowledge patients' search for knowledge, that they discuss the information offered by patients and guide them to reliable and accurate health websites. It is recommended that courses, such as 'patient informatics' are integrated in health professionals' education.

摘要

目的

健康信息是互联网上最常被搜索的主题之一。开展了一项文献综述,以确定患者对互联网健康信息的使用情况以及这如何影响患者与健康专业人员之间的关系。

方法

本研究是一项文献综述,总结了关于单个主题的多项实证研究,并非旨在进行荟萃分析。

结果

综述表明,患者进行的大多数与健康相关的互联网搜索是针对特定疾病状况。这些搜索由患者在以下情况下进行:(1) 在临床就诊前,以寻求信息来独立管理自身医疗保健和/或决定是否需要专业帮助;(2) 在临床就诊后,为了安心或因对健康专业人员在就诊期间提供的详细信息量不满意。

结论

患者的角色已从健康信息的被动接受者转变为主动消费者。健康专业人员正通过以下三种方式中的一种或多种来应对信息更灵通的患者:(1) 健康专业人员因患者带来的信息而感到受到威胁,并通过坚持其“专家意见”做出防御性回应(以健康专业人员为中心的关系)。(2) 健康专业人员和患者合作获取和分析信息(以患者为中心的关系)。(3) 健康专业人员将引导患者访问可靠的健康信息网站(互联网处方)。

实践意义

健康专业人员认识到患者对知识的搜索、讨论患者提供的信息并引导他们访问可靠且准确的健康网站非常重要。建议将“患者信息学”等课程纳入健康专业人员的教育中。

相似文献

1
Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship.患者通过互联网获取健康信息:这如何影响医患关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
2
Informed patients and the internet: a mediated context for consultations with health professionals.知情的患者与互联网:与医疗专业人员咨询的中介环境。
J Health Psychol. 2006 Mar;11(2):269-82. doi: 10.1177/1359105306061186.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Provider-patient dialogue about Internet health information: an exploration of strategies to improve the provider-patient relationship.关于互联网健康信息的医患对话:改善医患关系策略的探索
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jun;66(3):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
5
Consumer access to health care information: its effect on the physician-patient relationship.消费者获取医疗保健信息:其对医患关系的影响。
Alaska Med. 2002 Oct-Dec;44(4):75-82.
6
Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians' patient-centred communication matter?患者参与专科医疗会诊:医生以患者为中心的沟通是否重要?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.011. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
7
A new model for physician-patient communication.一种新的医患沟通模式。
Patient Educ Couns. 1994 Jun;23(2):131-40. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(94)90051-5.
8
The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions.互联网上的健康信息对医患关系的影响:患者认知
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1727-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1727.
9
Health and the Internet--changing boundaries in primary care.健康与互联网——基层医疗中不断变化的界限
Fam Pract. 2004 Apr;21(2):189-91. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh215.
10
Direct-to-consumer communication on prescription only medicines via the internet in the Netherlands, a pilot study. Opinion of the pharmaceutical industry, patient associations and support groups.荷兰通过互联网进行的仅凭处方销售药品的直接面向消费者的沟通:一项试点研究。制药行业、患者协会及支持团体的意见
Pharm World Sci. 2004 Jun;26(3):169-72. doi: 10.1023/b:phar.0000026806.29066.e1.

引用本文的文献

1
Is YouTube a reliable source for learning pre-endodontic build-up? A cross-sectional study.YouTube是学习根管治疗术前牙体预备的可靠来源吗?一项横断面研究。
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;50(3):e27. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e27. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Recommender Systems in Health Professions Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.卫生专业教育中的推荐系统:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 21;14:e69979. doi: 10.2196/69979.
3
Evaluating the reliability and quality of knee osteoarthritis educational content on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional content analysis.
评估抖音和哔哩哔哩上膝骨关节炎教育内容的可靠性和质量:一项横断面内容分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 12;11:20552076251366390. doi: 10.1177/20552076251366390. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Consulting "Dr. Google": how the digital search for internet health information influences doctor-patient relationship.向“谷歌医生”咨询:通过数字搜索获取网络健康信息如何影响医患关系。
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Aug 8;41(7):e00153623. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN153623. eCollection 2025.
5
Health literacy in five districts in Sri Lanka: a baseline assessment of health literacy levels among 18-49-year-olds and associated factors.斯里兰卡五个地区的健康素养:18至49岁人群健康素养水平及相关因素的基线评估。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 15;25(1):2460. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23641-z.
6
The effects of older Chinese adults' online behaviors on their health habits and health status.中国老年人的网络行为对其健康习惯和健康状况的影响。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 10;11:20552076251359130. doi: 10.1177/20552076251359130. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Principles for Health-Related Information on Social Media (PRHISM) for Evaluating Breast Cancer Treatment Videos on YouTube: Instrument Validation Study.评估社交媒体上健康相关信息原则(PRHISM)对YouTube上乳腺癌治疗视频评估的信度和效度:工具验证研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jun 11;5:e66416. doi: 10.2196/66416.
8
Mapping patient encounters to identify recruitment timepoints after brain tumour surgery: a cohort and cross-sectional study.绘制患者诊疗过程以确定脑肿瘤手术后的招募时间点:一项队列研究和横断面研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 14;14(2):e003065. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003065.
9
Developing a General Population Screening Programme for Paediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Evidence from a Qualitative Study of the Perspectives and Attitudes of Parents.制定针对儿童1型糖尿病的普通人群筛查计划:来自一项关于家长观点和态度的定性研究的证据
Pediatr Diabetes. 2024 Feb 20;2024:9927027. doi: 10.1155/2024/9927027. eCollection 2024.
10
Exploring the Use of Social Media for Medical Problem Solving by Analyzing the Subreddit r/medical_advice: Quantitative Analysis.通过分析Reddit子版块r/medical_advice探索社交媒体在解决医疗问题中的应用:定量分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Mar 20;5:e56116. doi: 10.2196/56116.