• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube是学习根管治疗术前牙体预备的可靠来源吗?一项横断面研究。

Is YouTube a reliable source for learning pre-endodontic build-up? A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Gökyar Merve, Özden İdil, Öveçoğlu Hesna Sazak

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;50(3):e27. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e27. Epub 2025 Jul 24.

DOI:10.5395/rde.2025.50.e27
PMID:40904257
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12415235/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to comprehensively analyze the quality, educational value, and demographic characteristics of pre-endodontic build-up videos published on the YouTube™ platform (Google LLC).

METHODS

The study was conducted on YouTube™ using the keyword "pre-endodontic build-up." The first 100 videos retrieved from the search results were reviewed, and 61 videos meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. After assessing the demographic characteristics of the videos, viewing rates and interaction indices were calculated. The quality of the videos was evaluated using the DISCERN instrument and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). Statistical analyses were performed on the obtained results.

RESULTS

A total of 61 videos were analyzed, of which 56% were uploaded by endodontists. The majority of the videos were found to be of low quality. As the DISCERN score increased, video duration, number of likes, number of comments, and view rate also increased. Additionally, a significant positive correlation was observed between the DISCERN score and the GQS value (p = 0.004). The relationship between video upload sources and various parameters was analyzed, revealing statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering all the evaluation methods used in this study, it is evident that the number of high-quality videos is low. This finding indicates that YouTube™ does not provide sufficient information on pre-endodontic build-up. To enhance its reliability as a source of medical information, YouTube™ should prioritize content that is not only popular but also accurate and of high quality, preferably created or endorsed by professionals.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在全面分析在YouTube™平台(谷歌有限责任公司)上发布的根管治疗前牙体预备视频的质量、教育价值和人口统计学特征。

方法

在YouTube™上使用关键词“根管治疗前牙体预备”进行研究。对从搜索结果中检索到的前100个视频进行审查,并对符合纳入标准的61个视频进行分析。在评估视频的人口统计学特征后,计算观看率和互动指数。使用DISCERN工具和全球质量量表(GQS)评估视频质量。对所得结果进行统计分析。

结果

共分析了61个视频,其中56%由牙髓病医生上传。发现大多数视频质量较低。随着DISCERN评分的增加,视频时长、点赞数、评论数和观看率也增加。此外,DISCERN评分与GQS值之间存在显著正相关(p = 0.004)。分析了视频上传来源与各种参数之间的关系,发现存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.05)。

结论

考虑到本研究中使用的所有评估方法,显然高质量视频的数量较少。这一发现表明,YouTube™没有提供足够的关于根管治疗前牙体预备的信息。为了提高其作为医学信息来源的可靠性,YouTube™应优先考虑不仅受欢迎而且准确且高质量的内容,最好由专业人员创建或认可。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c23/12415235/73e655719e27/rde-2025-50-e27f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c23/12415235/73e655719e27/rde-2025-50-e27f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c23/12415235/73e655719e27/rde-2025-50-e27f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Is YouTube a reliable source for learning pre-endodontic build-up? A cross-sectional study.YouTube是学习根管治疗术前牙体预备的可靠来源吗?一项横断面研究。
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;50(3):e27. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e27. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Evaluation of the quality and reliability of using YouTube as a patient information source for gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculectomy: A cross-sectional study.评估将YouTube用作房角镜辅助小梁切除术患者信息来源的质量和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e44132. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044132.
3
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Optic Neuritis: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Validated Scoring Systems.评估YouTube上视神经炎相关视频的质量和可靠性:一项使用经过验证的评分系统的横断面研究。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14527.
4
Quality and Dissemination of Uterine Fibroid Health Information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.抖音和哔哩哔哩上子宫肌瘤健康信息的质量与传播:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 1;9:e75120. doi: 10.2196/75120.
5
Social Media Depictions of the Impact of Noise Pollution on Communication and Mental and Physical Health.社交媒体对噪声污染对沟通以及身心健康影响的描述
J Community Health. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1007/s10900-025-01457-7.
6
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Ingrown Toenails.作为嵌甲信息来源的YouTube视频质量评估
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2025 Jan-Feb;115(1). doi: 10.7547/22-054.
7
Evaluation of Validity and Reliability of YouTube and Vimeo Contents About the Management of Tooth Fracture in Permanent Dentition: A Cross-Sectional Study.关于恒牙列牙齿折断处理的YouTube和Vimeo内容的有效性和可靠性评估:一项横断面研究
Dent Traumatol. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1111/edt.70014.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
Evaluating the quality of osteonecrosis and avascular necrosis content on youtube: a multidimensional analysis using DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS tools.评估YouTube上关于骨坏死和缺血性坏死内容的质量:使用DISCERN、《美国医学会杂志》和GQS工具进行的多维度分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 22;20(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06116-0.
10
YouTube as a Source for Arabic-Speaking Parent Education on the Oral Hygiene of Children: A Social Media Content Analysis.YouTube作为阿拉伯语家长儿童口腔卫生教育的来源:一项社交媒体内容分析
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jul-Aug;42(4):1469-1477. doi: 10.1111/phn.13551. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Youtube videos as a source of information on digital indirect bonding: A content analysis.作为数字间接粘结信息来源的YouTube视频:一项内容分析。
Eur Oral Res. 2023 Sep 6;57(3):138-143. doi: 10.26650/eor.20231152882.
2
Prior Restorative Procedures to Endodontic Treatment.牙髓治疗前的修复治疗程序。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 4;15(4):e37106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37106. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Evaluation of the quality of YouTube™ videos about pit and fissure sealant applications.评价 YouTube™ 视频中窝沟封闭剂应用相关内容的质量。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Aug;21(3):590-598. doi: 10.1111/idh.12646. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
Assessment of the educational value of endodontic access cavity preparation YouTube video as a learning resource for students.评估牙髓腔入口制备 YouTube 视频作为学生学习资源的教育价值。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 10;17(8):e0272765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272765. eCollection 2022.
5
Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.YouTube 是健康相关信息的可靠来源吗?一项系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 19;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z.
6
YouTube™ as an information source for regenerative endodontic treatment procedures: Quality and content analysis.YouTube™作为再生牙髓治疗程序的信息来源:质量与内容分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 May;161:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104732. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
7
Pre-endodontic restoration of structurally compromised teeth: current concepts.牙体结构不完善患牙的牙髓前修复:当前理念。
Br Dent J. 2021 Sep;231(6):343-349. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3467-0. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
YouTube as a source of information about pulpotomy and pulp capping: a cross sectional reliability analysis.YouTube作为牙髓切断术和牙髓盖髓术信息来源的横断面可靠性分析
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jul 6;46(3):e40. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e40. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
YouTube as an information source for instrument separation in root canal treatment.YouTube作为根管治疗中器械分离的信息来源。
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jan 12;46(1):e8. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e8. eCollection 2021 Feb.
10
Endodontic Periapical Lesion: An Overview on the Etiology, Diagnosis and Current Treatment Modalities.牙髓根尖周病损:病因、诊断及当前治疗方法概述。
Eur Endod J. 2020 Jul 14;5(2):54-67. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.42714. eCollection 2020.