Otyepka Michal, Bártová Iveta, Kríz Zdenek, Koca Jaroslav
Department of Physical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecules and Complex Molecular Systems, Palacký University, tr. Svobody 26, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
J Biol Chem. 2006 Mar 17;281(11):7271-81. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509699200. Epub 2006 Jan 9.
A detailed analysis is presented of the dynamics of human CDK5 in complexes with the protein activator p25 and the purine-like inhibitor roscovitine. These and other findings related to the activation of CDK5 are critically reviewed from a molecular perspective. In addition, the results obtained on the behavior of CDK5 are compared with data on CDK2 to assess the differences and similarities between the two kinases in terms of (i) roscovitine binding, (ii) regulatory subunit association, (iii) conformational changes in the T-loop following CDK/regulatory subunit complex formation, and (iv) specificity in CDK/regulatory subunit recognition. An energy decomposition analysis, used for these purposes, revealed why the binding of p25 alone is sufficient to stabilize the extended active T-loop conformation of CDK5, whereas the equivalent conformational change in CDK2 requires both the binding of cyclin A and phosphorylation of the Thr(160) residue. The interaction energy of the CDK5 T-loop with p25 is about 26 kcal.mol(-1) greater than that of the CDK2 T-loop with cyclin A. The binding pattern between CDK5 and p25 was compared with that of CDK2/cyclin A to find specific regions involved in CDK/regulatory subunit recognition. The analyses performed revealed that the alphaNT-helix of cyclin A interacts with the alpha6-alpha7 loop and the alpha7 helix of CDK2, but these regions do not interact in the CDK5/p25 complex. Further differences between the CDK5/p25 and CDK2/cyclin A systems studied are discussed with respect to their specific functionality.
本文详细分析了人类细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶5(CDK5)与蛋白激活剂p25以及嘌呤样抑制剂roscovitine形成复合物时的动力学。从分子角度对这些以及其他与CDK5激活相关的发现进行了批判性综述。此外,将CDK5的行为结果与CDK2的数据进行比较,以评估这两种激酶在以下方面的差异和相似性:(i)roscovitine结合;(ii)调节亚基结合;(iii)CDK/调节亚基复合物形成后T环的构象变化;(iv)CDK/调节亚基识别的特异性。为此目的进行的能量分解分析揭示了为什么单独p25的结合足以稳定CDK5延伸的活性T环构象,而CDK2中类似的构象变化则需要细胞周期蛋白A的结合和苏氨酸(Thr160)残基的磷酸化。CDK5的T环与p25的相互作用能比CDK2的T环与细胞周期蛋白A的相互作用能大约高26 kcal·mol⁻¹。将CDK5与p25之间的结合模式与CDK2/细胞周期蛋白A的结合模式进行比较,以找到参与CDK/调节亚基识别的特定区域。所进行的分析表明,细胞周期蛋白A的αNT螺旋与CDK2的α6-α7环和α7螺旋相互作用,但这些区域在CDK5/p25复合物中不相互作用。还讨论了所研究的CDK5/p25和CDK2/细胞周期蛋白A系统在其特定功能方面的进一步差异。