Suppr超能文献

评估哮喘控制药物的双盲、随机、对照试验。

Double-blind, randomised, controlled trial assessing controller medications in asthma.

作者信息

Shah A R, Sharples L D, Solanki R N, Shah K V

机构信息

Department of Chest Diseases, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.

出版信息

Respiration. 2006;73(4):449-56. doi: 10.1159/000090898. Epub 2006 Jan 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The motive behind conducting this study was to determine if better control of asthma can be achieved by adding a second controller medication and to assess its use to reduce the dose of inhaled steroids.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to determine whether either oral sustained-release theophylline or montelukast added to inhaled steroids improved clinical symptoms and pulmonary function test parameters when compared to high-dose steroids alone.

METHODS

Ninety patients with incompletely controlled asthma were allocated, in a randomised, double-blind fashion, to one of three treatment groups: group A: double dose of inhaled budesonide (400 microg b.i.d.), group B: 400 mg oral sustained-release theophylline plus budesonide (200 microg b.i.d.) and group C: 10 mg montelukast plus budesonide (200 microg b.i.d.). The primary endpoints were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).

RESULTS

All three groups had improved FEV(1) and PEFR at 8 weeks (p < 0.001). Group C increased their PEFR by 18.7 l/min (95% confidence interval, CI, 12.4-25.1) more than group A and by 19.8 l/min (95% CI 13.4-26.1) more than group B (both p = 0.001). Similarly, group C had a 114 ml (95% CI 45-183 ml) greater improvement in FEV(1) than group A and a 95 ml (95% CI 26-164 ml) greater improvement than group B (both p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of montelukast to budesonide is safe and results in greater improvement in pulmonary function test parameters than high-dose budesonide treatment or addition of theophylline.

摘要

背景

开展本研究的目的是确定添加第二种控制药物是否能更好地控制哮喘,并评估其用于减少吸入性类固醇剂量的效果。

目的

本研究旨在确定与单独使用高剂量类固醇相比,添加口服缓释茶碱或孟鲁司特至吸入性类固醇时,是否能改善临床症状和肺功能测试参数。

方法

90例哮喘控制不佳的患者以随机、双盲方式被分配至三个治疗组之一:A组:双倍剂量吸入布地奈德(400微克,每日两次);B组:400毫克口服缓释茶碱加布地奈德(200微克,每日两次);C组:10毫克孟鲁司特加布地奈德(200微克,每日两次)。主要终点为1秒用力呼气量(FEV₁)和早晨平均呼气峰值流速(PEFR)。

结果

所有三组在8周时FEV₁和PEFR均有改善(p < 0.001)。C组的PEFR比A组增加了18.7升/分钟(95%置信区间,CI,12.4 - 25.1),比B组增加了19.8升/分钟(95%CI 13.4 - 26.1)(均p = 0.001)。同样,C组的FEV₁比A组改善了114毫升(95%CI 45 - 183毫升),比B组改善了95毫升(95%CI 26 - 164毫升)(均p = 0.01)。

结论

在布地奈德中添加孟鲁司特是安全的,并且与高剂量布地奈德治疗或添加茶碱相比,能使肺功能测试参数得到更大改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验