Suppr超能文献

盐湖城环境监测项目中细颗粒物质量的连续测定:实时与传统锥形元件振荡微天平监测结果的比较

Continuous determination of fine particulate matter mass in the Salt Lake City Environmental Monitoring project: a comparison of real-time and conventional TEOM monitor results.

作者信息

Long Russell W, Eatough Norman L, Eatough Delbert J, Meyer Michael B, Wilson William E

机构信息

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

出版信息

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Dec;55(12):1839-46.

Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) mass was determined on a continuous basis at the Salt Lake City Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Monitoring for Public Awareness and Community Tracking monitoring site in Salt Lake City, UT, using three different monitoring techniques. Hourly averaged PM2.5 mass data were collected during two sampling periods (summer 2000 and winter 2002) using a real-time total ambient mass sampler (RAMS), sample equilibration system (SES)-tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM), and conventional TEOM monitor. This paper compares the results obtained from the various monitoring systems, which differ in their treatment of semivolatile material (SVM; particle-bound water, semivolatile ammonium nitrate, and semivolatile organic compounds). PM2.5 mass results obtained by the RAMS were consistently higher than those obtained by the SES-TEOM and conventional TEOM monitors because of the RAMS ability to measure semivolatile ammonium nitrate and semivolatile organic material but not particle-bound water. The SES-TEOM monitoring system was able to account for an average of 28% of the SVM, whereas the conventional TEOM monitor loses essentially all of the SVM from the single filter during sampling. Occasional mass readings by the various TEOM monitors that are higher than RAMS results may reflect particle-bound water, which, under some conditions, is measured by the TEOM but not the RAMS.

摘要

在犹他州盐湖城的盐湖城环境保护局公众意识与社区跟踪环境监测站点,采用三种不同的监测技术持续测定细颗粒物(PM2.5)质量。在两个采样期(2000年夏季和2002年冬季),使用实时总环境质量采样器(RAMS)、样品平衡系统(SES)-锥形元件振荡微天平(TEOM)和传统TEOM监测仪收集每小时平均PM2.5质量数据。本文比较了从各种监测系统获得的结果,这些系统在处理半挥发性物质(SVM;颗粒结合水、半挥发性硝酸铵和半挥发性有机化合物)方面存在差异。由于RAMS能够测量半挥发性硝酸铵和半挥发性有机物质,但不能测量颗粒结合水,因此RAMS获得的PM2.5质量结果始终高于SES-TEOM和传统TEOM监测仪获得的结果。SES-TEOM监测系统能够平均计入28%的SVM,而传统TEOM监测仪在采样期间从单个滤膜上基本上损失了所有的SVM。各种TEOM监测仪偶尔出现的高于RAMS结果的质量读数可能反映了颗粒结合水,在某些条件下,颗粒结合水可被TEOM测量,但不能被RAMS测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验