Suppr超能文献

非应激/最佳支架置入术治疗冠状动脉疾病(SCANDSTENT)试验

The Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-stress/benestent Disease (SCANDSTENT) trial.

作者信息

Kelbaek Henning, Thuesen Leif, Helqvist Steffen, Kløvgaard Lene, Jørgensen Erik, Aljabbari Samir, Saunamäki Kari, Krusell Lars R, Jensen Gunnar V H, Bøtker Hans E, Lassen Jens F, Andersen Henning R, Thayssen Per, Galløe Anders, van Weert Anton

机构信息

Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 17;47(2):449-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.045. Epub 2005 Dec 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the SCANDSTENT study was to evaluate the use of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in complex coronary lesions.

BACKGROUND

The use of SES improves angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) in simple coronary artery lesions, but there is limited evidence of their safety and efficacy when implanted in complex lesions.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 322 patients with symptomatic complex coronary artery disease to receive either SES or BMS. The lesions were occluded (36%), bifurcational (34%), ostial (22%), or angulated (8%) in morphology. The primary end point was the difference in minimal lumen diameter six months after stent implantation.

RESULTS

The patients were well matched in terms of demographic and angiographic baseline characteristics; 18% had diabetes. The reference vessel diameter was 2.86 mm in mean, and the lesion length 18.0 mm. At follow-up, patients who received SES had a minimal lumen diameter of 2.48 mm compared with 1.65 mm in those who received BMS (p < 0.001), a diameter stenosis of 19.3% versus 43.8% (p < 0.001), and 2.0% versus 31.9% developed restenosis (p < 0.001). The rate of major adverse cardiac events was 4.3% with SES versus 29.3% with BMS (p < 0.001), and stent thrombosis was observed in 0.6% in the SES group versus 3.1% in the BMS group (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SES markedly reduced restenosis and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with complex coronary artery lesions without increasing the risk of stent thrombosis.

摘要

目的

SCANDSTENT研究的目的是评估西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)在复杂冠状动脉病变中的应用。

背景

与裸金属支架(BMS)相比,SES在简单冠状动脉病变中的应用可改善血管造影和临床结果,但在复杂病变中植入时,其安全性和有效性的证据有限。

方法

我们将322例有症状的复杂冠状动脉疾病患者随机分配接受SES或BMS。病变形态为闭塞性(36%)、分叉性(34%)、开口处(22%)或成角性(8%)。主要终点是支架植入后6个月时最小管腔直径的差异。

结果

患者在人口统计学和血管造影基线特征方面匹配良好;18%患有糖尿病。平均参考血管直径为2.86 mm,病变长度为18.0 mm。随访时,接受SES的患者最小管腔直径为2.48 mm,而接受BMS的患者为1.65 mm(p<0.001),直径狭窄率分别为19.3%和43.8%(p<0.001),再狭窄发生率分别为2.0%和31.9%(p<0.001)。SES组主要不良心脏事件发生率为4.3%,BMS组为29.3%(p<0.001),SES组支架血栓形成率为0.6%,BMS组为3.1%(p=0.15)。

结论

SES的应用显著降低了复杂冠状动脉病变患者的再狭窄率和主要不良心脏事件的发生率,且未增加支架血栓形成的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验