Crit Care. 2005 Dec 6;10(1):R8. doi: 10.1186/cc3934.
National clinical practice guidelines have recommended specific empiric antimicrobial regimes for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. However, evidence confirming improved mortality with many of these regimes is lacking. Our aim was to determine the association between the empiric use of a β-lactam with fluoroquinolone, compared with other recommended antimicrobial therapies, and mortality in patients hospitalized with severe community-acquired pneumonia.
A retrospective observational study was conducted at two tertiary teaching hospitals. Eligible subjects were admitted with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia and had a chest X-ray and a discharge ICD-9 diagnosis consistent with this. Subjects were excluded if they received 'comfort measures only' during the admission, had been transferred from another acute care hospital, did not meet criteria for severe pneumonia, or were treated with non-guideline-concordant antibiotics. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the association between 30-day mortality and the use of a β-lactam antibiotic with a fluoroquinolone compared with other guideline-concordant therapies, after adjustment for potential confounders including a propensity score.
Data were abstracted on 172 subjects at the two hospitals. The mean age was 63.5 years (SD 15.0). The population was 88% male; 91% were admitted through the emergency department and 62% were admitted to the intensive care unit within the first 24 hours after admission. Mortality was 19.8% at 30 days. After adjustment for potential confounders the use of a β-lactam with a fluoroquinolone (odds ratio 2.71, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 6.1) was associated with increased mortality.
The use of initial empiric antimicrobial therapy with a β-lactam and a fluoroquinolone was associated with increased short-term mortality for patients with severe pneumonia in comparison with other guideline-concordant antimicrobial regimes. Further research is needed to determine the range of appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapies for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia.
国家临床实践指南已为患有严重社区获得性肺炎的患者推荐了具体的经验性抗菌治疗方案。然而,缺乏这些方案在改善死亡率方面的证据。我们的目的是确定与β-内酰胺与氟喹诺酮联合使用相比,其他推荐的抗菌治疗方案与住院治疗的严重社区获得性肺炎患者的死亡率之间的关联。
在两家三级教学医院进行了回顾性观察性研究。符合条件的患者因社区获得性肺炎入院,其胸部 X 射线和出院 ICD-9 诊断均符合该诊断。如果患者在入院期间仅接受“姑息治疗”、从另一家急性护理医院转来、不符合严重肺炎标准或接受非指南一致的抗生素治疗,则将其排除在外。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,在校正潜在混杂因素(包括倾向评分)后,评估与β-内酰胺抗生素与氟喹诺酮联合使用相比,30 天死亡率与使用其他指南一致的治疗方法之间的关联。
从两家医院共提取了 172 名患者的数据。平均年龄为 63.5 岁(标准差 15.0)。该人群中 88%为男性;91%通过急诊室入院,62%在入院后 24 小时内入住重症监护病房。30 天死亡率为 19.8%。在校正潜在混杂因素后,β-内酰胺与氟喹诺酮联合使用(比值比 2.71,95%置信区间 1.2 至 6.1)与死亡率增加相关。
与其他指南一致的抗菌治疗方案相比,严重肺炎患者初始经验性抗菌治疗中使用β-内酰胺和氟喹诺酮与短期死亡率增加相关。需要进一步研究以确定适用于严重社区获得性肺炎患者的经验性抗菌治疗方案范围。