评估苏格兰普通牙科实践中与口腔健康相关的生活质量:OHIP-14的验证

Assessing oral health-related quality of life in general dental practice in Scotland: validation of the OHIP-14.

作者信息

Fernandes Marcelo José, Ruta Danny Adolph, Ogden Graham Richard, Pitts Nigel Berry, Ogston Simon Alexander

机构信息

Section of Public Health, Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;34(1):53-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00254.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To validate the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 in a sample of patients attending general dental practice.

METHODS

Patients with pathology-free impacted wisdom teeth were recruited from six general dental practices in Tayside, Scotland, and followed for a year to assess the development of problems related to impaction. The OHIP-14 was completed at baseline and at 1-year follow-up, and analysed using three different scoring methods: a summary score, a weighted and standardized score and the total number of problems reported. Instrument reliability was measured by assessing internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was assessed using a number of variables. Linear regression was then used to model the relationship between OHIP-14 and all significantly correlated variables. Responsiveness was measured using the standardized response mean (SRM). Adjusted R(2)s and SRMs were calculated for each of the three scoring methods. Estimates for the differences between adjusted R(2)s and the differences between SRMs were obtained with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 278 and 169 patients completed the questionnaire at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Reliability - Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.30 to 0.75. Alpha coefficients for all 14 items were 0.88 and 0.87 for baseline and follow-up, respectively. Test-retest coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.78. Validity - OHIP-14 scores were significantly correlated with number of teeth, education, main activity, the use of mouthwash, frequency of seeing a dentist, the reason for the last dental appointment, smoking, alcohol intake, pain and symptoms. Adjusted R(2)s ranged from 0.123 to 0.202 and there were no statistically significant differences between those for the three different scoring methods. Responsiveness - The SRMs ranged from 0.37 to 0.56 and there was a statistically significant difference between the summary scores method and the total number of problems method for symptomatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The OHIP-14 is a valid and reliable measure of oral health-related quality of life in general dental practice and is responsive to third molar clinical change. The summary score method demonstrated performance as good as, or better than, the other methods studied.

摘要

目的

在就诊于普通牙科诊所的患者样本中验证口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP)-14。

方法

从苏格兰泰赛德地区的六家普通牙科诊所招募无病理改变的阻生智齿患者,并随访一年以评估与阻生相关问题的发展情况。在基线和1年随访时完成OHIP-14,并使用三种不同的评分方法进行分析:总分、加权标准化分数以及报告的问题总数。通过评估内部一致性和重测信度来测量工具的可靠性。使用多个变量评估结构效度。然后使用线性回归对OHIP-14与所有显著相关变量之间的关系进行建模。使用标准化反应均值(SRM)测量反应度。计算三种评分方法各自的调整R²和SRM。获得调整R²之间差异以及SRM之间差异的估计值,并给出95%置信区间。

结果

分别有278名和169名患者在基线和随访时完成了问卷。可靠性——克朗巴哈α系数范围为0.30至0.75。所有14个条目的α系数在基线和随访时分别为0.88和0.87。重测系数范围为0.72至0.78。效度——OHIP-14得分与牙齿数量、教育程度、主要活动、漱口水使用情况、看牙医频率、上次看牙医的原因、吸烟、饮酒量、疼痛和症状显著相关。调整R²范围为0.123至0.202且三种不同评分方法之间无统计学显著差异。反应度——SRM范围为0.37至0.56,有症状患者的总分法和问题总数法之间存在统计学显著差异。

结论

OHIP-14是普通牙科诊所中口腔健康相关生活质量的有效且可靠的测量工具,并且对第三磨牙的临床变化有反应。总分法表现与所研究的其他方法相当或更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索