Suppr超能文献

受聘(“礼宾式”)执业的医生。一项关于医生、患者及执业特征的全国性调查。

Physicians in retainer ("concierge") practice. A national survey of physician, patient, and practice characteristics.

作者信息

Alexander G Caleb, Kurlander Jacob, Wynia Matthew K

机构信息

Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Dec;20(12):1079-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0233.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retainer practices represent a new model of care whereby physicians charge an up-front fee for services that may not be covered by health insurance. The characteristics of these practices are largely unknown.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional mail survey of 144 retainer physicians (58% response rate) and a national random sample of 463 nonretainer physicians (50% response rate) to compare retainer and nonretainer practices. Outcomes of interest included physician demographics, size and case-mix of patient panel, services offered and, for retainer practices, characteristics of practice development.

RESULTS

Retainer physicians have much smaller patient panels (mean 898 vs 2303 patients, P<.0001) than their nonretainer counterparts, and care for fewer African-American (mean 7% vs 16%, P<.002), Hispanic (4% vs 14%, P<.001), or Medicaid (5% vs 15%, P<.001) patients. Physicians in retainer practices are more likely to offer accompanied specialist visits (30% vs 1%), house calls (63% vs 26%), 24-hour direct physician access (91% vs 40%), and several other services (all P values <.05). Most retainer physicians (85%) converted from nonretainer practices but kept few of their former patients (mean 12%). Most retainer physicians (84%) provide charity care and many continue to see some patients (mean 17%) who do not pay retainer fees.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences between retainer and nonretainer practices, there is also substantial overlap in services provided. These findings, in conjunction with the scope of patient discontinuity when physicians transition to retainer practice, suggest that ethical and legal debates about the standing of these practices will endure.

摘要

背景

预付费医疗模式是一种新的医疗模式,医生对医疗保险可能不涵盖的服务收取预付款。这些模式的特点在很大程度上尚不为人所知。

设计、背景和参与者:我们对144名预付费医生进行了横断面邮件调查(回复率为58%),并对463名非预付费医生进行了全国随机抽样调查(回复率为50%),以比较预付费和非预付费医疗模式。感兴趣的结果包括医生的人口统计学特征、患者群体的规模和病例组合、提供的服务,以及对于预付费医疗模式,其发展特征。

结果

预付费医生的患者群体比非预付费医生小得多(平均898名患者对2303名患者,P<0.0001),照顾的非裔美国人患者(平均7%对16%,P<0.002)、西班牙裔患者(4%对14%,P<0.001)或医疗补助患者(5%对15%,P<0.001)也更少。预付费医疗模式的医生更有可能提供陪同专科就诊(30%对1%)、上门服务(63%对26%)、24小时直接联系医生服务(91%对40%)以及其他几项服务(所有P值<0.05)。大多数预付费医生(85%)从非预付费医疗模式转变而来,但保留的以前患者很少(平均12%)。大多数预付费医生(84%)提供慈善医疗服务,许多人还继续为一些不支付预付费的患者看病(平均17%)。

结论

尽管预付费和非预付费医疗模式存在差异,但提供的服务也有很大重叠。这些发现,连同医生转向预付费医疗模式时患者中断的范围,表明关于这些模式地位的伦理和法律辩论将持续存在。

相似文献

1
Physicians in retainer ("concierge") practice. A national survey of physician, patient, and practice characteristics.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Dec;20(12):1079-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0233.x.
4
Concierge medicine: a "regular" physician's perspective.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):391-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00009.
7
The three faces of retainer care: crafting a tailored regulatory response.
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2007 Winter;7(1):39-97.
8
Retainer medicine: an ethically legitimate form of practice that can improve primary care.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 1;155(9):633-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-9-201111010-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct primary care: Family physician perceptions of a growing model.
Popul Med. 2021 Aug;3. doi: 10.18332/popmed/140087. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
Direct Primary Care in 2015: A Survey with Selected Comparisons to 2005 Survey Data.
Kans J Med. 2017 Feb 15;10(1):3-6. eCollection 2017 Feb.
3
Trends in the Types of Usual Sources of Care: A Shift from People to Places or Nothing at All.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2346-2367. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12753. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Small-Area Estimation of Spatial Access to Care and Its Implications for Policy.
J Urban Health. 2015 Oct;92(5):864-909. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-9972-1.
8
Training Tomorrow's Comprehensive Primary Care Internists: A Way Forward for Internal Medicine Education.
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Jun;5(2):187-91. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00134.1.
10
Paying for enhanced service: comparing patients' experiences in a concierge and general medicine practice.
Patient. 2009 Jun 1;2(2):95-103. doi: 10.2165/01312067-200902020-00005.

本文引用的文献

1
Luxury primary care, academic medical centers, and the erosion of science and professional ethics.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):90-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.20631.x.
2
Tiered-provider networks: patients face cost-choice trade-offs.
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2003 Nov(71):1-7.
3
Primary care in a new era: disillusion and dissolution?
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):262-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00035.
4
Luxury primary care--market innovation or threat to access?
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1165-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200204113461513.
5
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;50(10):1129-36. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1.
7
Future trends in the economics of medical practice and care.
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Aug 23;56(5):50C-59C. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(85)80011-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验