Nennstiel Ruprecht, Rahm Joachim
Forensic Science Institute, Bundeskriminalamt, Thaerstr.11, D 65193 Wiesbaden, Germany.
J Forensic Sci. 2006 Jan;51(1):24-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00003.x.
The majority of published experimental evaluations of the performance of the IBIS system are based on very specific conditions, mainly considering IBIS as a tool to create a "ballistic database." No recent reports were found covering the performance of the IBIS system to search an open case file of realistic structure. In this paper, the performance of the IBIS correlator will be evaluated, based on four different data sources that predominantly concern the operation of the central collection of evidence ammunition of the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), Germany. The results allow a conclusion on the success and error rates to be expected of the IBIS correlator in a realistic OCFDB ("open case file database") environment, given certain conditions. It was found that success rates of 75-95% for cartridge case comparisons and 50-75% for bullet comparisons can be achieved in practice. Recommendations for a most efficient way to operate the IBIS electronic comparison system will be presented based on the results of the evaluations. The terms and definitions in this report completely correspond with the definitions in an earlier article. Familiarity with this article is therefore absolutely necessary to fully understand many of the statements presented here.
大多数已发表的关于IBIS系统性能的实验评估都是基于非常特定的条件,主要将IBIS视为创建“弹道数据库”的工具。目前尚未发现近期有报告涵盖IBIS系统在搜索具有实际结构的未结案件档案方面的性能。在本文中,将基于四个主要涉及德国联邦刑事警察局(BKA)中央证据弹药收集工作的不同数据源,对IBIS关联器的性能进行评估。在某些条件下,这些结果有助于得出在实际的OCFDB(“未结案件档案数据库”)环境中IBIS关联器预期的成功率和错误率。研究发现,在实际操作中,弹壳比对的成功率可达75% - 95%,子弹比对的成功率可达50% - 75%。将根据评估结果提出关于最有效操作IBIS电子比对系统的建议。本报告中的术语和定义与早期一篇文章中的定义完全一致。因此,要完全理解此处提出的许多陈述,绝对有必要熟悉那篇文章。