Lüdtke Rainer, Hacke Daniela
Karl und Veronica Carstens-Stiftung, Essen, Germany.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2005 Nov;155(21-22):482-90. doi: 10.1007/s10354-005-0227-8.
Arnica montana is a homeopathic remedy often prescribed after traumata and injuries.
To assess whether Arnica is effective beyond placebo and to identify factors which support or contradict this effectiveness.
All prospective, controlled trials on the effectiveness of homeopathic Arnica were included. Overall effectiveness was assessed by meta-analysis and meta-regression techniques.
68 comparisons from 49 clinical trials show a significant effectiveness of Arnica in traumatic injuries in random effects meta-analysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.55), but not in meta-regression models (OR, 0.37; CI, 0.11-1.24). We found no evidence for publication bias. Studies from Medline-listed journals and high-quality studies are less likely to report positive results (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.0167).
The hypothesis that homeopathic Arnica is effective could neither be proved nor rejected. All trials were highly heterogeneous, meta-regression does not help to explain this heterogeneity substantially.
山金车是一种顺势疗法药物,常用于创伤和损伤后。
评估山金车是否比安慰剂更有效,并确定支持或反驳其有效性的因素。
纳入所有关于顺势疗法山金车有效性的前瞻性对照试验。通过荟萃分析和荟萃回归技术评估总体有效性。
49项临床试验中的68项比较显示,在随机效应荟萃分析中,山金车对创伤性损伤具有显著有效性(优势比[OR],0.36;95%置信区间[CI],0.24 - 0.55),但在荟萃回归模型中并非如此(OR,0.37;CI,0.11 - 1.24)。我们没有发现发表偏倚的证据。来自医学期刊数据库列出的期刊的研究和高质量研究报告阳性结果的可能性较小(p = 0.0006和p = 0.0167)。
顺势疗法山金车有效的假设既未得到证实也未被否定。所有试验具有高度异质性,荟萃回归并不能很大程度上解释这种异质性。