Suppr超能文献

[论顺势疗法药物山金车的疗效]

[On the effectiveness of the homeopathic remedy Arnica montana].

作者信息

Lüdtke Rainer, Hacke Daniela

机构信息

Karl und Veronica Carstens-Stiftung, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Wien Med Wochenschr. 2005 Nov;155(21-22):482-90. doi: 10.1007/s10354-005-0227-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arnica montana is a homeopathic remedy often prescribed after traumata and injuries.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether Arnica is effective beyond placebo and to identify factors which support or contradict this effectiveness.

METHODS

All prospective, controlled trials on the effectiveness of homeopathic Arnica were included. Overall effectiveness was assessed by meta-analysis and meta-regression techniques.

RESULTS

68 comparisons from 49 clinical trials show a significant effectiveness of Arnica in traumatic injuries in random effects meta-analysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.55), but not in meta-regression models (OR, 0.37; CI, 0.11-1.24). We found no evidence for publication bias. Studies from Medline-listed journals and high-quality studies are less likely to report positive results (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.0167).

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesis that homeopathic Arnica is effective could neither be proved nor rejected. All trials were highly heterogeneous, meta-regression does not help to explain this heterogeneity substantially.

摘要

背景

山金车是一种顺势疗法药物,常用于创伤和损伤后。

目的

评估山金车是否比安慰剂更有效,并确定支持或反驳其有效性的因素。

方法

纳入所有关于顺势疗法山金车有效性的前瞻性对照试验。通过荟萃分析和荟萃回归技术评估总体有效性。

结果

49项临床试验中的68项比较显示,在随机效应荟萃分析中,山金车对创伤性损伤具有显著有效性(优势比[OR],0.36;95%置信区间[CI],0.24 - 0.55),但在荟萃回归模型中并非如此(OR,0.37;CI,0.11 - 1.24)。我们没有发现发表偏倚的证据。来自医学期刊数据库列出的期刊的研究和高质量研究报告阳性结果的可能性较小(p = 0.0006和p = 0.0167)。

结论

顺势疗法山金车有效的假设既未得到证实也未被否定。所有试验具有高度异质性,荟萃回归并不能很大程度上解释这种异质性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验