Dreschler W A
Academic Medical Center, Department of Clinical Audiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Audiology. 1992;31(3):121-31. doi: 10.3109/00206099209072907.
Multichannel hearing aids have been introduced recently in clinical practice. In this paper, some advantages and disadvantages of multichannel hearing aids are discussed. The advantages include an improved use of compression. However, the number of settings will be larger in multichannel hearing aids and exact knowledge of the goal to be pursued by compression is more necessary than ever. Inexactness of the definitions of these goals may have been a reason for the contradictory results in the studies on multichannel compression. A number of requirements must be fulfilled for a successful application of multichannel compression. One of these is detailed knowledge about the perception of suprathreshold signals. For that reason, an extension of the battery of tests commonly used in rehabilitative audiology is necessary. Another requirement is that the fitting strategy is determined by the purpose of applying compression. The objectives will be different for compression limiting and syllabic compression. A fitting procedure used in clinical practice has to take into account some limitations in the fitting time available. A number of possible fitting tools are discussed. Two strongly different fitting strategies for the same commercially available three-channel compression aid illustrate fundamental differences in fitting philosophy.
多通道助听器最近已引入临床实践。本文讨论了多通道助听器的一些优缺点。优点包括更好地利用压缩功能。然而,多通道助听器的设置数量会更多,而且比以往任何时候都更需要确切了解压缩所要追求的目标。这些目标定义的不精确可能是多通道压缩研究结果相互矛盾的一个原因。要成功应用多通道压缩,必须满足一些要求。其中之一是要详细了解阈上信号的感知。因此,有必要扩展康复听力学中常用的测试项目。另一个要求是,选配策略由应用压缩的目的决定。压缩限制和音节压缩的目标会有所不同。临床实践中使用的选配程序必须考虑到可用选配时间的一些限制。文中讨论了一些可能的选配工具。针对同一市售三通道压缩助听器的两种截然不同的选配策略说明了选配理念的根本差异。