• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗惰性是实现《健康人民2010》血压控制目标的一个障碍。

Therapeutic inertia is an impediment to achieving the Healthy People 2010 blood pressure control goals.

作者信息

Okonofua Eni C, Simpson Kit N, Jesri Ammar, Rehman Shakaib U, Durkalski Valerie L, Egan Brent M

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2006 Mar;47(3):345-51. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000200702.76436.4b. Epub 2006 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1161/01.HYP.0000200702.76436.4b
PMID:16432045
Abstract

Therapeutic inertia (TI), defined as the providers' failure to increase therapy when treatment goals are unmet, contributes to the high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension (> or =140/90 mm Hg), but the quantitative impact is unknown. To address this gap, a retrospective cohort study was conducted on 7253 hypertensives that had > or =4 visits and > or =1 elevated blood pressure (BP) in 2003. A 1-year TI score was calculated for each patient as the difference between expected and observed medication change rates with higher scores reflecting greater TI. Antihypertensive therapy was increased on 13.1% of visits with uncontrolled BP. Systolic BP decreased in patients in the lowest quintile of the TI score but increased in those in the highest quintile (-6.8+/-0.5 versus +1.8+/-0.6 mm Hg; P<0.001). Individuals in the lowest TI quintile were &33 times more likely to have their BP controlled at the last visit than those in highest quintile (odds ratio, 32.7; 95% CI, 25.1 to 42.6; P<0.0001). By multivariable analysis, TI accounted for &19% of the variance in BP control. If TI scores were decreased &50%, that is, increasing medication dosages on &30% of visits, BP control would increase from the observed 45.1% to a projected 65.9% in 1 year. This study confirms the high rate of TI in uncontrolled hypertensive subjects. TI has a major impact on BP control in hypertensive subjects receiving regular care. Reducing TI is critical in attaining the Healthy People 2010 goal of controlling hypertension in 50% of all patients.

摘要

治疗惰性(TI)被定义为当治疗目标未达成时,医疗服务提供者未能增加治疗措施,这导致了高血压(收缩压≥140/90 mmHg)控制不佳的高患病率,但具体的量化影响尚不清楚。为填补这一空白,对2003年就诊次数≥4次且血压升高≥1次的7253名高血压患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。为每位患者计算了1年的TI评分,即预期药物变化率与观察到的药物变化率之差,分数越高表明TI越高。在血压未得到控制的就诊中,有13.1%增加了抗高血压治疗。TI评分处于最低五分位数的患者收缩压下降,而处于最高五分位数的患者收缩压升高(-6.8±0.5 mmHg与+1.8±0.6 mmHg;P<0.001)。TI最低五分位数的个体在最后一次就诊时血压得到控制的可能性是最高五分位数个体的33倍(优势比为32.7;95%可信区间为25.1至42.6;P<0.0001)。通过多变量分析,TI占血压控制差异的19%。如果TI评分降低50%,即在30%的就诊中增加药物剂量,血压控制率将从观察到的45.1%在1年内提高到预计的65.9%。本研究证实了血压未得到控制的高血压患者中TI发生率很高。TI对接受常规治疗的高血压患者的血压控制有重大影响。降低TI对于实现《健康人民2010》中50%的患者控制高血压的目标至关重要。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic inertia is an impediment to achieving the Healthy People 2010 blood pressure control goals.治疗惰性是实现《健康人民2010》血压控制目标的一个障碍。
Hypertension. 2006 Mar;47(3):345-51. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000200702.76436.4b. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
2
[A specific questionnaire to evaluate therapeutic inertia in hypertensive patients: a pilot study].[一份评估高血压患者治疗惰性的特定问卷:一项试点研究]
J Mal Vasc. 2014 Feb;39(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmv.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
3
Reasons for therapeutic inertia when managing hypertension in clinical practice in non-Western countries.非西方国家临床实践中管理高血压时治疗惰性的原因。
J Hum Hypertens. 2009 Mar;23(3):151-9. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.117. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
4
A comparison between antihypertensive medication adherence and treatment intensification as potential clinical performance measures.作为潜在临床绩效指标的抗高血压药物依从性与治疗强化之间的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):276-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965665. Epub 2012 May 10.
5
Stage 2 hypertension: predictors of failure to achieve blood pressure control and the impact of adding one additional antihypertensive class.2级高血压:血压控制未达标的预测因素及增加另一类抗高血压药物的影响
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Nov;24(11):1170-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3849. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
6
Initial angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy achieves superior blood pressure control compared with calcium channel blocker monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension.与钙通道阻滞剂单药治疗相比,初始血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/钙通道阻滞剂联合治疗在2级高血压患者中能实现更好的血压控制。
Am J Hypertens. 2004 Jun;17(6):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.02.003.
7
[On the way to achieve hypertension treatment goals: results of the open observational program AESCULAP (exforge--clinical safety and efficiency of using a double combination of antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure)].在实现高血压治疗目标的道路上:开放观察性项目AESCULAP(安博诺——在血压控制不佳患者中使用双重抗高血压药物组合的临床安全性和有效性)的结果
Ter Arkh. 2013;85(9):35-45.
8
Association Between Self-Reported Medication Adherence and Therapeutic Inertia in Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).自我报告的药物依从性与高血压治疗惰性之间的关联:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的二次分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e031574. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031574. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
9
When more is not better: treatment intensification among hypertensive patients with poor medication adherence.何时并非越多越好:药物依从性差的高血压患者强化治疗情况
Circulation. 2008 Jun 3;117(22):2884-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724104. Epub 2008 May 27.
10
Importance of therapy intensification and medication nonadherence for blood pressure control in patients with coronary disease.强化治疗和药物治疗不依从对冠心病患者血压控制的重要性。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Feb 11;168(3):271-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.72.

引用本文的文献

1
Polypill Strategies for Cardiovascular Prevention in Older Adults: Evidence, Opportunities, and Implementation Challenges.老年人心血管疾病预防的多效药丸策略:证据、机遇与实施挑战
Drugs Aging. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01243-z.
2
The Gulliver syndrome: a conceptual framework to address therapeutic inertia in patients with borderline cardiovascular risk profiles.格列佛综合征:一种解决心血管风险临界患者治疗惰性的概念框架。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 14;12:1652447. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1652447. eCollection 2025.
3
Impact of Blood Pressure Control on Stroke and Myocardial Infarction Risk in Hypertensive Patients With and Without Diabetes: A Narrative Review.
血压控制对合并或不合并糖尿病的高血压患者中风和心肌梗死风险的影响:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e88984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88984. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Therapeutic inertia in statin therapy for secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide population-based cohort study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后他汀类药物二级预防治疗中的惰性:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05081-0.
5
Treatment in the First Month After Hypertension Diagnosis Improves Blood Pressure Control.高血压诊断后第一个月内进行治疗可改善血压控制。
Hypertension. 2025 Jun;82(6):1129-1136. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23508. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
6
Evaluating the Relationship Between Inertia Levels and Tendency to Medical Errors Among Nurses in Paediatric Clinics.评估儿科诊所护士的惯性水平与医疗差错倾向之间的关系。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70069. doi: 10.1111/jep.70069.
7
Novel pharmacological approaches to lowering blood pressure and managing hypertension.降低血压和控制高血压的新型药理学方法。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Feb 7. doi: 10.1038/s41569-025-01131-4.
8
Improving Therapeutic Adherence and Reducing Therapeutic Inertia in the Management of People with Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Call-to-Action from the Middle East.改善心血管代谢疾病患者管理中的治疗依从性并减少治疗惰性:来自中东的行动呼吁。
Adv Ther. 2025 Mar;42(3):1340-1359. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03103-5. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
9
Simplified Approach to Managing Newly Diagnosed Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension in Routine Clinical Practice.常规临床实践中管理新诊断的轻至中度高血压患者的简化方法
Adv Ther. 2025 Feb;42(2):1108-1130. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03091-6. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
10
Clinical Inertia in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension Following Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.动态血压监测后高血压诊断与管理中的临床惰性
Am J Hypertens. 2025 Apr 15;38(5):280-287. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpae157.