Okonofua Eni C, Simpson Kit N, Jesri Ammar, Rehman Shakaib U, Durkalski Valerie L, Egan Brent M
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Hypertension. 2006 Mar;47(3):345-51. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000200702.76436.4b. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
Therapeutic inertia (TI), defined as the providers' failure to increase therapy when treatment goals are unmet, contributes to the high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension (> or =140/90 mm Hg), but the quantitative impact is unknown. To address this gap, a retrospective cohort study was conducted on 7253 hypertensives that had > or =4 visits and > or =1 elevated blood pressure (BP) in 2003. A 1-year TI score was calculated for each patient as the difference between expected and observed medication change rates with higher scores reflecting greater TI. Antihypertensive therapy was increased on 13.1% of visits with uncontrolled BP. Systolic BP decreased in patients in the lowest quintile of the TI score but increased in those in the highest quintile (-6.8+/-0.5 versus +1.8+/-0.6 mm Hg; P<0.001). Individuals in the lowest TI quintile were &33 times more likely to have their BP controlled at the last visit than those in highest quintile (odds ratio, 32.7; 95% CI, 25.1 to 42.6; P<0.0001). By multivariable analysis, TI accounted for &19% of the variance in BP control. If TI scores were decreased &50%, that is, increasing medication dosages on &30% of visits, BP control would increase from the observed 45.1% to a projected 65.9% in 1 year. This study confirms the high rate of TI in uncontrolled hypertensive subjects. TI has a major impact on BP control in hypertensive subjects receiving regular care. Reducing TI is critical in attaining the Healthy People 2010 goal of controlling hypertension in 50% of all patients.
治疗惰性(TI)被定义为当治疗目标未达成时,医疗服务提供者未能增加治疗措施,这导致了高血压(收缩压≥140/90 mmHg)控制不佳的高患病率,但具体的量化影响尚不清楚。为填补这一空白,对2003年就诊次数≥4次且血压升高≥1次的7253名高血压患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。为每位患者计算了1年的TI评分,即预期药物变化率与观察到的药物变化率之差,分数越高表明TI越高。在血压未得到控制的就诊中,有13.1%增加了抗高血压治疗。TI评分处于最低五分位数的患者收缩压下降,而处于最高五分位数的患者收缩压升高(-6.8±0.5 mmHg与+1.8±0.6 mmHg;P<0.001)。TI最低五分位数的个体在最后一次就诊时血压得到控制的可能性是最高五分位数个体的33倍(优势比为32.7;95%可信区间为25.1至42.6;P<0.0001)。通过多变量分析,TI占血压控制差异的19%。如果TI评分降低50%,即在30%的就诊中增加药物剂量,血压控制率将从观察到的45.1%在1年内提高到预计的65.9%。本研究证实了血压未得到控制的高血压患者中TI发生率很高。TI对接受常规治疗的高血压患者的血压控制有重大影响。降低TI对于实现《健康人民2010》中50%的患者控制高血压的目标至关重要。