Suppr超能文献

一项随机临床试验中单纯性静脉曲张手术与保守治疗的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgery versus conservative treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins in a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Ratcliffe J, Brazier J E, Campbell W B, Palfreyman S, MacIntyre J B, Michaels J A

机构信息

Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2006 Feb;93(2):182-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5263.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite being a common procedure, the cost effectiveness of surgery for varicose veins has not been established.

METHODS

Cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out alongside a randomized clinical trial at two vascular units within National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Some 246 patients with uncomplicated varicose veins and evidence of saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal reflux were allocated randomly to receive either conservative management or surgical treatment. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 24 months following randomization was calculated.

RESULTS

Total NHS costs during the 2-year study period were higher for the surgically treated group (733 UK pounds) than for those who had conservative treatment (345 UK pounds). The difference in costs was statistically significant. The mean incremental health gain from surgical treatment at 24 months was 0.083 QALYs, leading to a base-case estimate of 4682 UK pounds per QALY gained. Assuming an implicit threshold maximum willingness-to-pay value of 20 000 UK pounds for a QALY, the probability of surgical treatment for varicose veins falling below this threshold value was 70 per cent. This result was found to be robust to sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

For patients with uncomplicated varicose veins and evidence of saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal reflux, surgical treatment for varicose veins offers a modest health benefit for relatively little additional NHS cost relative to conservative treatment.

摘要

背景

尽管静脉曲张手术是一种常见手术,但其成本效益尚未确定。

方法

在国民健康服务(NHS)医院的两个血管科进行随机临床试验的同时进行成本效益分析。约246例患有单纯性静脉曲张且有隐股或隐腘反流证据的患者被随机分配接受保守治疗或手术治疗。计算随机分组后24个月每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本。

结果

在为期2年的研究期间,手术治疗组的NHS总费用(733英镑)高于接受保守治疗的组(345英镑)。费用差异具有统计学意义。手术治疗在24个月时的平均健康收益增量为0.083个QALY,得出每获得一个QALY的基础估计成本为4682英镑。假设QALY的隐含阈值最大支付意愿值为20000英镑,静脉曲张手术低于该阈值的概率为70%。该结果在敏感性分析中表现稳健。

结论

对于患有单纯性静脉曲张且有隐股或隐腘反流证据的患者,相对于保守治疗,静脉曲张手术在增加相对较少的NHS成本的情况下能带来适度的健康益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验