Madersbacher Helmut
Neuro-Urology Unit, Department of Neurology, Landeskrankenhaus Univ.- Klinik Innsbruck. A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
J Med Liban. 2004 Oct-Dec;52(4):220-6.
The overactive bladder (OAB) is a highly prevalent condition characterized by the combination of urgency and frequency with or without urge incontinence. The pathophysiology is multifactorial; the background is complicated and not yet fully understood. The basic diagnostic workup comprises symptoms assessment, targeted physical examination, urine analysis, post-void residual urine estimation which mostly allows to make a working diagnosis and to find out which patients can be treated also by the nonspecialist. The bladder diary is an optimal diagnostic instrument with a lot of information, whereas urodynamics are expensive and somewhat unverified in their value. The symptom-focused diagnosis is absolutely sufficient to start nonoperative therapy for OAB symptoms. The OAB presents a treatment challenge, as the management of OAB patients is not standardized. An algorithm should include an initial period of at least 6 weeks of conservative therapy consisting of antimuscarinic drugs in combination with behavioral therapy including pelvic floor exercises. If this combination is not successful, the primary diagnosis should be questioned and additional diagnostic tests may be required. If the therapy is successful after 8 weeks, a continuation should be considered in case the symptoms occur after stopping pharmacological therapy. Further therapy depends on the severity of the initial symptoms, the presence of side effects and the motivation of the patient. If pharmacotherapy is not successful or additional therapy desirable, electrical neuromodulation can be added for another period of 6 weeks for up to 3-6 months considering firstly non-invasive therapeutic modalities before recommending invasive sacral neuromodulation. Neuromodulation should be discussed before more invasive procedures, such as bladder augmentation, are considered. There are potentially promising new therapies on the horizon for the OAB. The use of intravesical agents, which decrease the afferent-sensory input, may herald a new therapeutic paradigm for the treatment of the OAB. Refinements in the techniques and the delivery vehicle for electrical stimulation may offer an even less invasive method of neuromodulation. Finally, ongoing research in biotechnology and tissue engineering may produce a functional, stable, compatible tissue substitute suitable for bladder augmentation. The objectives are (1) to define the overactive bladder, (2) to understand the prevalence of the overactive bladder and its impact on the quality of life, (3) to review the basic evaluation of the patient with symptoms suggestive of the overactive bladder and how to differentiate the overactive bladder from other types of urinary dysfunction, and (4) to understand the rationale for and the approach to therapy for the overactive bladder.
膀胱过度活动症(OAB)是一种高度常见的病症,其特征为尿急、尿频,伴或不伴有急迫性尿失禁。其病理生理学是多因素的;背景复杂且尚未完全明确。基本的诊断检查包括症状评估、针对性体格检查、尿液分析、排尿后残余尿量估计,这大多能做出初步诊断,并找出哪些患者也可由非专科医生治疗。膀胱日记是一种能提供大量信息的理想诊断工具,而尿动力学检查昂贵且其价值在一定程度上未经证实。以症状为重点的诊断对于开始针对OAB症状的非手术治疗绝对足够。OAB带来了治疗挑战,因为OAB患者的管理并不规范。一种算法应包括至少6周的初始保守治疗期,由抗毒蕈碱药物联合行为疗法组成,行为疗法包括盆底肌锻炼。如果这种联合治疗不成功,应质疑初步诊断,可能需要进行额外的诊断检查。如果8周后治疗成功,在停止药物治疗后症状再次出现的情况下应考虑继续治疗。进一步的治疗取决于初始症状的严重程度、副作用的存在以及患者的积极性。如果药物治疗不成功或需要额外治疗,可以增加为期6周、最长3至6个月的电神经调节治疗,首先考虑非侵入性治疗方式,然后再推荐侵入性骶神经调节治疗。在考虑更具侵入性的手术(如膀胱扩大术)之前,应讨论神经调节治疗。对于OAB,未来可能有前景广阔的新疗法。使用降低传入感觉输入的膀胱内给药制剂,可能预示着治疗OAB的新治疗模式。电刺激技术和给药载体的改进可能提供一种侵入性更小的神经调节方法。最后,生物技术和组织工程方面正在进行的研究可能会产生一种适用于膀胱扩大术的功能性、稳定、兼容的组织替代物。目标是:(1)定义膀胱过度活动症;(2)了解膀胱过度活动症的患病率及其对生活质量的影响;(3)回顾对有膀胱过度活动症疑似症状患者的基本评估,以及如何将膀胱过度活动症与其他类型的排尿功能障碍相鉴别;(4)了解膀胱过度活动症治疗的基本原理和方法。