Chi Chia-Fen, Chang Tin-Chang, Tsou Chi-Lin
Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science & Technology, 43 Keelung Road, Sec 4, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Jul;38(4):662-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.12.010. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
In 2000, the accident rate for escalator riding was about 0.815 accidents per million passenger trips through Taipei Metro Rapid Transit (MRT) heavy capacity stations. In order to reduce the probability and severity of escalator riding accidents and enhance the safety of passengers, the Drury and Brill model [Drury, C.G., Brill, M., 1983. Human factors in consumer product accident investigation. Hum. Factors 25 (3), 329-342] for in-depth investigation was adopted to analyze the 194 escalator riding accidents in terms of victim, task, product and environment. Prevention measures have been developed based on the major causes of accidents and other related contributing factors. The results from the analysis indicated that the majority of the escalator riding accidents was caused by passengers' carrying out other tasks (38 cases, including carrying luggage 24 cases, looking after accompany persons 9 cases, and 5 others), loss of balance (26 cases, 13.4%), not holding the handrail (20 cases, 10.3%), unhealthy passengers (18 cases, 9.3%), followed by people struck by other passenger (16 cases, 8.2%). For female passengers aged 15-64 years, their rushing for trains accidents could have been prevented by wearing safer footwear or by appropriate signing being provided indicating the location and traveling direction of escalators. Female passengers aged 65 years and above whose accidents were caused by loss of balance, should be encouraged to take the elevator instead. To prevent entrapment injuries, following a stricter design code can be most effective. Further in-depth accident investigation is suggested to cover the activity of the victim prior to the accident, any involved product, the location of the accident on the escalator, any medical treatment, what went wrong, opinion of the respondent on the causes of the accident, and personal characteristics of the passengers. Also, management must trade off productivity and safety appropriately to prevent "Organizational Accidents".
2000年,台北捷运大容量车站每百万乘客人次的自动扶梯乘坐事故率约为0.815起。为降低自动扶梯乘坐事故的概率和严重程度,提高乘客安全性,采用了Drury和Brill模型[Drury, C.G., Brill, M., 1983. 消费品事故调查中的人为因素。《人类因素》25(3),329 - 342]进行深入调查,从受害者、任务、产品和环境方面分析了194起自动扶梯乘坐事故。根据事故的主要原因和其他相关促成因素制定了预防措施。分析结果表明,大多数自动扶梯乘坐事故是由乘客执行其他任务导致的(38起,包括携带行李24起、照顾陪同人员9起以及其他5起)、失去平衡(26起,占13.4%)、未握住扶手(20起,占10.3%)、身体不适的乘客(18起,占9.3%),其次是被其他乘客碰撞(16起,占8.2%)。对于15 - 64岁的女性乘客,她们因赶火车而发生的事故可以通过穿着更安全的鞋子或提供标明自动扶梯位置和行进方向的适当标识来预防。65岁及以上的女性乘客因失去平衡而发生事故的,应鼓励她们乘坐电梯。为防止被困受伤,遵循更严格的设计规范可能最为有效。建议进一步深入调查事故,包括事故发生前受害者的活动、任何相关产品、事故在自动扶梯上的位置、任何医疗救治情况、出了什么问题、被调查者对事故原因的看法以及乘客的个人特征。此外,管理层必须在生产率和安全之间进行适当权衡,以防止“组织事故”。